Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479549›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine reports2022

A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting.

Nicole C Zanolli, Luke A Gatta, Laura Fish, Margaret Falkovic, Amelia Lorenzo, Allison M Puechl, Laura J Havrilesky, Brittany Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole C ZanolliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Luke A GattaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Laura FishDuke Cancer Institute Behavioral Health and Survey Research Core, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Margaret FalkovicDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amelia LorenzoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Allison M PuechlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Laura J HavrileskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brittany DavidsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke Institute for Health Innovation · USDuke University · USDurham County Department of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although skilled goals of care (GOC) conversations are known to reduce aggressive futile end-of-life care, they have not been widely implemented nor standardized in the care of gynecologic malignancies. Clinicians express concern regarding patient readiness and willingness to participate in these conversations, which may be a barrier to GOC discussions. Methods: This is a qualitative study, conducted at an academic institution in the United States, of patients with gynecologic malignancies at high risk of death within six months and who had recently completed a GOC discussion with their oncology clinician during an ambulatory visit. Within 10 days of this conversation, patients were approached for potential participation in an hour-long semistructured interview. Patients enrolled in hospice or who were non-English speaking were excluded. Participants were enrolled until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed and coded using the five-stage thematic approach. Results: Ten women were consented and participated in semistructured interviews, which occurred a median of 4 (range 1-18) days after the index GOC discussion. The median age was 64 (range 37-78), and the most common diagnosis (50%) was recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Four themes were identified: (1) delivery of the GOC conversation, (2) importance of prioritizing individual values, (3) involving family in decision making, and (4) openness to discussing discontinuation of anticancer treatment and hospice. Patients generally felt these GOC conversations were useful, providing a space to express their values and did not compromise the patient-clinician relationship. Conclusions: Patients seemed willing to engage in GOC conversations and were appreciative of their clinicians' communication skills. Often, they used this conversation as an opportunity to convey personal values affecting their care.

Indexed as

communicationend of lifegoals of caregynecologic cancerspatient–clinician relationship

Identifiers

PMID36479549
PMCPMC9712054
OpenAlexW4309676727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.