ReviewJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2022
Methodology for clinical research.
Review in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Causal relationship between mental illness and venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomization study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- [Methodological and ethical congruence in medical research protocols at a local hospital committee].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- NATURAL HISTORY OF THE GASTROJEJUNAL ANASTOMOSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- From Inflammation to Malignancy: The Link Between Endometriosis and Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Questions, Challenges, and Possibilities When Joining Critical Disabilities Studies and Healthcare Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SQUARE-IT: a proposed approach to square the identified research problem in the literature with the objectives, the appropriate clinical research question, and the research hypothesis.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Assessment of eHealth Literacy in Healthcare Service Users: Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025Article
- Journal data-sharing policies and its impact in publications: A cross-sectional study protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Influence of the work environment on patient safety and stress among healthcare professionals.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- Clinical Evaluation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Determinants of the implementation of eHealth-based long-term follow-up care for young cancer survivors: a qualitative study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Patient awareness and attitudes towards minimally invasive surgery.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Occupational-Health Nursing as a Prospect for Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clinical research requires a systematic approach with diligent planning, execution and sampling in order to obtain reliable and validated results, as well as an understanding of each research methodology is essential for researchers. Indeed, selecting an inappropriate study type, an error that cannot be corrected after the beginning of a study, results in flawed methodology. The results of clinical research studies enhance the repertoire of knowledge regarding a disease pathogenicity, an existing or newly discovered medication, surgical or diagnostic procedure or medical device. Medical research can be divided into primary and secondary research, where primary research involves conducting studies and collecting raw data, which is then analysed and evaluated in secondary research. The successful deployment of clinical research methodology depends upon several factors. These include the type of study, the objectives, the population, study design, methodology/techniques and the sampling and statistical procedures used. Among the different types of clinical studies, we can recognize descriptive or analytical studies, which can be further categorized in observational and experimental. Finally, also pre-clinical studies are of outmost importance, representing the steppingstone of clinical trials. It is therefore important to understand the types of method for clinical research. Thus, this review focused on various aspects of the methodology and describes the crucial steps of the conceptual and executive stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.