Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479416›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2022

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, adherence, and adverse events among South African men who have sex with men and transgender women.

Linda-Gail Bekker, Danielle Giovenco, Stefan Baral, Karen Dominguez, Rachel Valencia, Travis Sanchez, A D McNaghten, Ryan Zahn, Clarence S Yah, Zinhle Sokhela and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0755-4386
Danielle GiovencoDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-5309
Stefan BaralBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-2419
Karen DominguezDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-3146
Rachel ValenciaDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9130-7176
Travis SanchezDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-4762
A D McNaghtenDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-4365
Ryan ZahnDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-2220
Clarence S YahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-1516
Zinhle SokhelaWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-6681
Richard KaplanDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1565-4704
Refliwe N Phaswana-MafuyaSouth African Medical Research Council/University of Johannesburg Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-0432
Chris BeyrerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-9124
Patrick S SullivanDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-0587
Emory University · USDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAEastern Virginia Medical School · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

Training in Child/Adolescent Biobehavioral HIV ResearchT32MH078788 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 2007 to 2026
$6.2M
Social and psychological predictors of PrEP adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Eastern and Southern AfricaF31MH119965 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GIOVENCO, DANIELLE · 2019 to 2020
$75k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH119965NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH078788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HIV prevention programmes that include pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in South Africa have not been widely implemented. Objectives: The authors examined oral PrEP uptake, adherence, and adverse events among HIV-uninfected MSM and TGW to inform intervention acceptability and feasibility. Method: In 2015, MSM and TGW in two South African cities were offered a comprehensive package of HIV prevention services, including daily oral PrEP, and were followed for one year. Different models of PrEP delivery were used at each site. Adherence was measured using self-report and pill-count data and tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations. Results: Among 135 participants who were eligible for PrEP, 82 (61%) initiated PrEP, of whom 67 (82%) were on PrEP at study end. Participants were on PrEP for a median of 294 out of 314.5 possible days (93% protected days). The median time from PrEP initiation to discontinuation or study end was 305 days (interquartile range: 232-325 days). Across the follow-up time points, 57% - 72% of participants self-reported taking protective levels of PrEP and 59% - 74% were adherent to PrEP as indicated by pill counts. Fewer (≤ 18%) achieved protective TFV-DP concentrations of ≥ 700 fmol/punch in dried blood spots. Side effects, while typically mild, were the most commonly cited reason by participants for early PrEP discontinuation. Conclusion: Many MSM and TGW initiated and maintained PrEP, demonstrating that PrEP can be successfully delivered to South African MSM and TGW in diverse programmatic contexts. Biologic adherence measures suggest MSM and TGW may experience challenges taking PrEP regularly. Counselling for coping with side effects and motivating daily pill taking is recommended to support South African MSM and TGW in achieving protection with PrEP.

Indexed as

HIVHIV preventionmen who have sex with menpre-exposure prophylaxissexually transmitted infectionsSouth Africatransgender women

Identifiers

PMID36479416
PMCPMC9724083
OpenAlexW4308248865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.