ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021
Evaluation of the
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- An Antimicrobial susceptibility study to compare the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents in the Philippines against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from different infection sites: results from ATLAS surveillance program (2018-2021).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular Surveillance of ESBL and Carbapenemase Genes in Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Various Clinical Samples Collected from Northern Region of United Arab Emirates.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Carbapenem-Sparing Antibiotics Versus Carbapenems for Treating Non-Bacteremic Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales Analyzed by ICU and Non-ICU Wards, Infection Sources, and Geographic Regions: ATLAS Program 2016-2020.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- New Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prevalence and genetic characterization of clinically relevant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producingFrontiers in antibiotics · 2023Review
- Relevance of the Consensus Principles for Appropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in 2022.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To report antimicrobial resistance data for Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated from paediatric patients in three hospitals in Kuwait during 2012-19. Methods: Results: Among 515 Enterobacterales isolates, 29.3% were ESBL-positive; susceptibility was highest to amikacin, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem (≥97.4%), regardless of ESBL status. CTX-M-15 was identified in 87.1% of ESBL-positive Conclusions: Most isolates of Enterobacterales (including resistant phenotypes) and
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.