Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2022

Labor induction information leaflets-Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?

Peter von Dadelszen, Susan Tohill, Julie Wade, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Janet Scott, Marcus Green, James G Thornton, Laura A Magee, WILL Pilot Trial Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter von DadelszenInstitute of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Susan TohillMaternity Services, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Julie WadeMaternity Services, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer A HutcheonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janet ScottSands, The Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity, London, United Kingdom.
Marcus GreenAction on Pre-eclampsia, Evesham, United Kingdom.
James G ThorntonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Laura A MageeInstitute of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
WILL Pilot Trial Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the extent to which a sample of NHS labor induction leaflets reflects evidence on labor induction. Setting: Audit of labor induction patient information leaflets-local from WILL trial (When to Induce Labor to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension) internal pilot sites or national-level available online. Methods: Descriptive analysis [ Results: All leaflets described an induction indication. Most leaflets ( Conclusion: Information provided to pregnant women regarding labor induction could be improved to better reflect women's choice between induction and expectant care, and the evidence upon which treatment recommendations are based. A multiple stakeholder-involved and evidence-informed process to update guidance is required.

Indexed as

evidence-to-implementation gaplabor inductionMorecombe Bay ReportOckenden Reportpatient information

Identifiers

PMID36479232
PMCPMC9719962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.