Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479189›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Machine learning and synthetic outcome estimation for individualised antimicrobial cessation.

William J Bolton, Timothy M Rawson, Bernard Hernandez, Richard Wilson, David Antcliffe, Pantelis Georgiou, Alison H Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William J BoltonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy M RawsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bernard HernandezCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard WilsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David AntcliffeDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Pantelis GeorgiouCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decision on when it is appropriate to stop antimicrobial treatment in an individual patient is complex and under-researched. Ceasing too early can drive treatment failure, while excessive treatment risks adverse events. Under- and over-treatment can promote the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We extracted routinely collected electronic health record data from the MIMIC-IV database for 18,988 patients (22,845 unique stays) who received intravenous antibiotic treatment during an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A model was developed that utilises a recurrent neural network autoencoder and a synthetic control-based approach to estimate patients' ICU length of stay (LOS) and mortality outcomes for any given day, under the alternative scenarios of if they were to stop vs. continue antibiotic treatment. Control days where our model should reproduce labels demonstrated minimal difference for both stopping and continuing scenarios indicating estimations are reliable (LOS results of 0.24 and 0.42 days mean delta, 1.93 and 3.76 root mean squared error, respectively). Meanwhile, impact days where we assess the potential effect of the unobserved scenario showed that stopping antibiotic therapy earlier had a statistically significant shorter LOS (mean reduction 2.71 days,

Indexed as

antibiotic cessationantimicrobial resistanceartificial intelligenceclinical decision support systemsdecision-makingindividualised antimicrobial prescribingoutcome estimationprecision prescribing

Identifiers

PMID36479189
PMCPMC9719971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.