Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479114›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Identification of cuproptosis-related subtypes, construction of a prognosis model, and tumor microenvironment landscape in gastric cancer.

Jinyan Wang, Dongmei Qin, Zhonghua Tao, Biyun Wang, Yizhao Xie, Ye Wang, Bin Li, Jianing Cao, Xiaosu Qiao, Shanliang Zhong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jinyan WangDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Dongmei QinDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhonghua TaoDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Biyun WangDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yizhao XieDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ye WangDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jianing CaoDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaosu QiaoDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanliang ZhongCenter of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xichun HuDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNNanjing Jiangning Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cuproptosis is a novel identified regulated cell death (RCD), which is correlated with the development, treatment response and prognosis of cancer. However, the potential role of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of gastric cancer (GC) remains unknown. Methods: Transcriptome profiling, somatic mutation, somatic copy number alteration and clinical data of GC samples were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to describe the alterations of CRGs from genetic and transcriptional fields. Differential, survival and univariate cox regression analyses of CRGs were carried out to investigate the role of CRGs in GC. Cuproptosis molecular subtypes were identified by using consensus unsupervised clustering analysis based on the expression profiles of CRGs, and further analyzed by GO and KEGG gene set variation analyses (GSVA). Genes in distinct molecular subtypes were also analyzed by GO and KEGG gene enrichment analyses (GSEA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened out from distinct molecular subtypes and further analyzed by GO enrichment analysis and univariate cox regression analysis. Consensus clustering analysis of prognostic DEGs was performed to identify genomic subtypes. Next, patients were randomly categorized into the training and testing group at a ratio of 1:1. CRG Risk scoring system was constructed through logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) cox regression analysis, univariate and multivariate cox analyses in the training group and validated in the testing and combined groups. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to evaluate the expression of key Risk scoring genes. Sensitivity and specificity of Risk scoring system were examined by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. pRRophetic package in R was used to investigate the therapeutic effects of drugs in high- and low- risk score group. Finally, the nomogram scoring system was developed to predict patients' survival through incorporating the clinicopathological features and CRG Risk score. Results: Most CRGs were up-regulated in tumor tissues and showed a relatively high mutation frequency. Survival and univariate cox regression analysis revealed that LIAS and FDX1 were significantly associated with GC patients' survival. After consensus unsupervised clustering analysis, GC patients were classified into two cuproptosis molecular subtypes, which were significantly associated with clinical features (gender, age, grade and TNM stage), prognosis, metabolic related pathways and immune cell infiltration in TME of GC. GO enrichment analyses of 84 DEGs, obtained from distinct molecular subtypes, revealed that DEGs primarily enriched in the regulation of metabolism and intracellular/extracellular structure in GC. Univariate cox regression analysis of 84 DEGs further screened out 32 prognostic DEGs. According to the expression profiles of 32 prognostic DEGs, patients were re-classified into two gene subtypes, which were significantly associated with patients' age, grade, T and N stage, and survival of patients. Nest, the Risk score system was constructed with moderate sensitivity and specificity. A high CRG Risk score, characterized by decreased microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), tumor mutation burden (TMB) and cancer stem cell (CSC) index, and high stromal and immune score in TME, indicated poor survival. Four of five key Risk scoring genes expression were dysregulated in tumor compared with normal samples. Moreover, CRG Risk score was greatly related with sensitivity of multiple drugs. Finally, we established a highly accurate nomogram for promoting the clinical applicability of the CRG Risk scoring system. Discussion: Our comprehensive analysis of CRGs in GC demonstrated their potential roles in TME, clinicopathological features, and prognosis. These findings may improve our understanding of CRGs in GC and provide new perceptions for doctors to predict prognosis and develop more effective and personalized therapy strategies.

Indexed as

ApoptosisStomach NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentCopperHumansNomogramsPrognosisRisk FactorsCoppercuproptosis-related genes (CRGs)drugs susceptibilitygastric cancer (GC)prognosis modeltumor microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID36479114
PMCPMC9719959
OpenAlexW4309745302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.