Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Using a classification model for determining the value of liver radiological reports of patients with colorectal cancer.

Wenjuan Liu, Xi Zhang, Han Lv, Jia Li, Yawen Liu, Zhenghan Yang, Xutao Weng, Yucong Lin, Hong Song, Zhenchang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Benefits and Risks of AI in Health Care: Narrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xi ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Han LvDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia LiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yawen LiuSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xutao WengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yucong LinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Hong SongSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Zhenchang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Institute of Technology · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNBeihang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical imaging is critical in clinical practice, and high value radiological reports can positively assist clinicians. However, there is a lack of methods for determining the value of reports. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish an ensemble learning classification model using natural language processing (NLP) applied to the Chinese free text of radiological reports to determine their value for liver lesion detection in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Radiological reports of upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were divided into five categories according to the results of liver lesion detection in patients with CRC. The NLP methods including word segmentation, stop word removal, and n-gram language model establishment were applied for each dataset. Then, a word-bag model was built, high-frequency words were selected as features, and an ensemble learning classification model was constructed. Several machine learning methods were applied, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and so on. We compared the accuracy between priori choosing pertinent word strings and our machine language methodologies. Results: The dataset of 2790 patients included CT without contrast (10.2%), CT with/without contrast (73.3%), MRI without contrast (1.8%), and MRI with/without contrast (14.6%). The ensemble learning classification model determined the value of reports effectively, reaching 95.91% in the CT with/without contrast dataset using XGBoost. The logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine also achieved good classification accuracy, reaching 95.89%, 95.04%, and 95.00% respectively. The results of XGBoost were visualized using a confusion matrix. The numbers of errors in categories I, II and V were very small. ELI5 was used to select important words for each category. Words such as "no abnormality", "suggest", "fatty liver", and "transfer" showed a relatively large degree of positive correlation with classification accuracy. The accuracy based on string pattern search method model was lower than that of machine learning. Conclusions: The learning classification model based on NLP was an effective tool for determining the value of radiological reports focused on liver lesions. The study made it possible to analyze the value of medical imaging examinations on a large scale.

Indexed as

classification modelcolorectal cancerliver lesionmedical imaging reportnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID36479085
PMCPMC9720132
OpenAlexW4309741517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.