Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479079›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Evaluation of the peritumoral features using radiomics and deep learning technology in non-spiculated and noncalcified masses of the breast on mammography.

Fei Guo, Qiyang Li, Fei Gao, Chencui Huang, Fandong Zhang, Jingxu Xu, Ye Xu, Yuanzhou Li, Jianghong Sun, Li Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fei GuoDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Qiyang LiDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Fei GaoDeepwise Artificial Intelligence Lab, Beijing Deepwise and League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Chencui HuangDeepwise Artificial Intelligence Lab, Beijing Deepwise and League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Fandong ZhangDeepwise Artificial Intelligence Lab, Beijing Deepwise and League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jingxu XuDeepwise Artificial Intelligence Lab, Beijing Deepwise and League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ye XuDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yuanzhou LiDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jianghong SunDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Li JiangDepartment of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the significance of peritumoral features based on deep learning in classifying non-spiculated and noncalcified masses (NSNCM) on mammography. Methods: We retrospectively screened the digital mammography data of 2254 patients who underwent surgery for breast lesions in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January to December 2018. Deep learning and radiomics models were constructed. The classification efficacy in ROI and patient levels of AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were compared. Stratified analysis was conducted to analyze the influence of primary factors on the AUC of the deep learning model. The image filter and CAM were used to visualize the radiomics and depth features. Results: For 1298 included patients, 771 (59.4%) were benign, and 527 (40.6%) were malignant. The best model was the deep learning combined model (2 mm), in which the AUC was 0.884 (P < 0.05); especially the AUC of breast composition B reached 0.941. All the deep learning models were superior to the radiomics models (P < 0.05), and the class activation map (CAM) showed a high expression of signals around the tumor of the deep learning model. The deep learning model achieved higher AUC for large size, age >60 years, and breast composition type B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Combining the tumoral and peritumoral features resulted in better identification of malignant NSNCM on mammography, and the performance of the deep learning model exceeded the radiomics model. Age, tumor size, and the breast composition type are essential for diagnosis.

Indexed as

deep learningmammographynon-spiculated and noncalcified massesperitumoral featuresradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36479079
PMCPMC9721450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.