Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36479002›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2022

Opioid use after elective spine surgery: Do spine surgery patients consume less than prescribed today?

Lindsay D Orosz, Alexandra E Thomson, Tarek Yamout, Fenil R Bhatt, Brandon Allen, Thomas C Schuler, Rita Roy, Christopher R Good, Colin M Haines, Ehsan Jazini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Friend or Foe: The Use of Cannabis as a Potential Analgesic in Postoperative Lumbar Spine Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The opioid crisis as it pertains to spine surgery.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay D OroszNational Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
Alexandra E ThomsonVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Tarek YamoutVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Fenil R BhattVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Brandon AllenNational Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
Thomas C SchulerVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Rita RoyNational Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
Christopher R GoodVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Colin M HainesVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Ehsan JaziniVirginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
Virginia Spine Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The opioid epidemic in the US has led prescribers to reevaluate postoperative pain control particularly in the field of spine surgery, where postoperative analgesia requirements and consumption have historically been high. There is a need to mitigate the quantity of unused pills after surgery by adjusting prescribing practices. Achieving the balance of pain control after surgery without overprescribing opioids may be accomplished by developing a modified approach to prescribing practices; however, there is a need to first understand the opioid requirements of the modern spine surgery patient with respect to their elective spine surgery. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine the percentage of opioids not utilized at 90-days after elective spine surgery. Secondary aims were to identify differences in the percentage of unused opioids between surgical subgroups and preoperative opioid status, to determine factors associated with opioid utilization, and to estimate the distribution of opioids consumed to control pain up to the 90th percentile in each surgical subgroup. Methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study, adults undergoing elective spine surgery at a multi-surgeon, single center were prospectively enrolled and divided into subgroups: anterior cervical, lumbar decompression, and short-segment lumbar fusion. Prescribed MMEs were identified from prescriptions, consumed MMEs were obtained from pill counts, and the percent leftover was calculated. Distributions of MMEs consumed were analyzed to compare utilization between preoperative opioid users or non-users within each surgical subgroup. Results: Of 117 patients, 41.9% were preoperative opioid users. The percentage of unused opioids by surgical subgroup was: 45.4% cervical, 57.3% lumbar decompression, and 37.4% lumbar fusion ( Conclusions: At 90-days, the percentage of unused opioids was over 45% in this cohort of elective spine surgery patients and was nearly double in the group without preoperative opioid exposure. These results suggest the modern elective spine surgery patient is using less opioids than prescribed, supporting the conclusion that the number of MMEs prescribed can be reduced to minimize quantities of leftover pills available for diversion, without sacrificing the priority of appropriate postoperative pain control.

Indexed as

ESROpioidOverprescribingPainPain managementSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID36479002
PMCPMC9720562
OpenAlexW4309914073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.