ArticleOncology letters2023
Treatment outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma of the lip: A retrospective study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip: A Systematic Review of Reported Practices, Clinical Outcomes, and Gaps in Consensus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Electrochemotherapy Treatment for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Cetuximab Leading to a Complete Pathologic Response in Locally Advanced Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral and lip cancer is the most common type of cancer among males in India. Early stage tumours of the lip (stages I and II) are treated with single modality treatment, using either radiotherapy [external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy] or surgery. Locally advanced tumours (stages III and IVa) are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical profile and treatment outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lip who were treated with radical intent at the Regional Cancer Centre (Thiruvananthapuram, India). For this purpose, a total of 120 patients treated with radical radiotherapy (brachytherapy or EBRT) or surgery with or without adjuvant treatment between January 2010 and December 2016 were eligible for the analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate the survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of various patient- and tumour-related factors and treatment modality on outcomes. At a median follow-up time of 67.6 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 4 years for the entire cohort were 69.1 and 86.7%, respectively. The 4-year OS rates for patients with stage I, II, III and IV disease were 88.9, 95.2, 86.8 and 75.3%, respectively, and the DFS rates were 83.6, 69.5, 78.8 and 42.9%, respectively. Primary tumour (P=0.025), nodal (P=0.005) and composite clinical (P=0.006) stage were found to be significant factors affecting DFS rates in the univariate analysis. However, only the nodal stage (P=0.005) was found to be a significant factor affecting DFS rates in the multivariate analysis. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the outcomes of patients with lip carcinoma are favourable when treated at the early stages, and the results from this series are in line with those already published.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.