ArticleInfection prevention in practice2023
Prevalence and correlates of knowledge and practices regarding infection prevention and control, and triage in primary healthcare settings: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh.
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the evolution of infectious disease preparedness among a province with poor economy in China in the wake of COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high prevalence of healthcare-acquired infection in resource-limited settings, healthcare workers' (HCWs') knowledge and practices of infection prevention and control (IPC) and triage are not well-researched. We examined thisin Bangladesh's primary healthcare facilities (HCFs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We surveyed 312 HCWs in 94 community clinics (CCs) and 90 family welfare centres (FWCs) in six districts from February to April 2021. We assessed HCWs' self-reported knowledge and observed practices in four domains: personal hygiene, medical instrument processing, waste management, and triage. We constructed a weighted composite knowledge score and estimated the association between knowledge and background characteristics using a generalised linear mixed effects model. Practices were described through univariate analysis. Findings: On a scale of 100, the mean composite knowledge score was 38.3 (SD: 13.3) overall and 44.0 (SD: 13.1) and 33.8 (SD: 11.6) for FWCs and CCs, respectively. The HCWs of FWCs were more aged, experienced, and educated than those of CCs. Knowledge score was the highest in personal hygiene and the lowest in medical waste segregation. Knowledge was significantly associated with HCWs' designation and education. Concerning practices, not more than one-third of the HCWs or HCFs, on average, followed the recommended protocols, except for wearing face masks while on duty (87.1%) and referring potential COVID-19 patients to higher-level facilities (68.3%). Conclusions: HCWs' capacity in instrument processing, waste management, and triage needs to be improved through formal education and training initiatives. Our study can contribute to the under-researched IPC and triage domains in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.