Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478852›Full record

ReviewAdvances in radiation oncology

Olfactory Sensations During Radiation Sessions: A Review.

Keisuke Sasai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Abnormal visual and olfactory sensations during radiation therapy: a prospective study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Synchronization of light flash with the irradiation pulse in proton beam therapy: A case report.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keisuke SasaiDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Misugikai Satou Hospital, Hirakata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: During radiation therapy sessions, certain patients may perceive smells, particularly in younger populations. The sense of smell generally does not interrupt treatment; hence, it has attracted limited attention from oncologists worldwide. However, in certain cases, the prevention of smell perception may be necessary when treating pediatric patients. In this regard, this study reviewed previous studies pertaining to this unusual phenomenon of smell perception during radiation sessions. Methods and Materials: A PubMed search using the terms "radi*" AND ("olfaction" OR "odor" OR "smell" OR "phantosmia") was performed, and 9 articles related to this sensation were identified. Furthermore, through the references in these 9 articles, 3 additional related studies were identified. Results: Perception of smell during radiation treatment sessions was first reported in 1989. This phenomenon entails the perception of a pungent, repulsive, and unpleasant smell and is generally only observed in the presence of radiation beams. Occasionally, these smell perceptions are also accompanied by visual and gustatory sensations. Patients complain about this sensation more frequently when their olfactory regions are irradiated. Nevertheless, some patients have also reported experiencing this sensation when these areas are not included in the radiation field. Although the intensity of this sensation is low, intervention is required to prevent it. The cause of this perception remains unclear and requires further investigation. Conclusions: Conclusions: During radiotherapy sessions, certain patients may perceive smells. The cause of this perception remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID36478852
PMCPMC9720511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.