Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478845›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Daytime versus nighttime laparoscopic appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: A retrospective study of 1001 appendectomies.

Amjad A Shah, Raed M Al-Zoubi, Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Mohamed Amine Rejeb, Laxmi Kumari Ojha, Sharif Abdulzem, Khadija Qadir, Sara Sameer, Ahmad Zarour, Mohamed Said Ghali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amjad A ShahAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Raed M Al-ZoubiSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmad R Al-QudimatSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed Amine RejebSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Laxmi Kumari OjhaSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Sharif AbdulzemAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Khadija QadirAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Sara SameerAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmad ZarourAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed Said GhaliAcute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAAin Shams University · EGJordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to study whether the time of day impacts the outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy. Peri/post-operative data including type of surgery, operating room time, length of stay, re-hospitalization rates, and short/long term morbidity and mortality were assembled and analyzed. Methods: A retrospective review of all patient's charts who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis at the Acute Care Surgery division at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) from December 2017 to July 2020 was performed. Our institution implemented SAGES protocol to patients with laparoscopic appendectomy. Medical history, symptoms, duration of symptoms, type of treatment, complication, experience level of surgeons in different shift, morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay were extracted and analyzed. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the odds ratio (OR) and the correlation of variables with different surgical groups. A total of 1001 patients were included in this study and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, 51.3% were operated during the daytime shifts and 48.7% during the nighttime shifts. The majority of surgeries were operated during the nighttime shift C (1:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Neither there was any difference in clinical outcomes nor day/night operation time with physicians. A statistically significant correlation was found between hospital-stay of patients with different surgical group (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Appendectomy conducted at night is correlated with similar complications as appendectomy performed during the day, and that the varied shift hours had no effect on the complication rates or on the quality of care provided to patients at our hospital.

Indexed as

AppendectomyComplicationsDelayLaparoscopicOutcomesShifts

Identifiers

PMID36478845
PMCPMC9720526
OpenAlexW4311028722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.