ArticleHeliyon2022
The effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance of alkali-activated fly ash-based geopolymer concrete beam.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical and Bond Performance of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Incorporating Natural and Recycled Diatoms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of reinforcement additives on physical and electrical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer materials.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bending Performance of Alkali-Activated Concrete Beams Based on Digital Image Correlation Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Proposed simplified methodological approach for designing geopolymer concrete mixtures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of borax-modified activator on mechanical properties and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag/metakaolin mortar.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alkali activated fly ash (AAFA) based geopolymer concrete structure is getting attention due to its eco-friendly construction characteristics and improved engineering properties. However, comprehensive studies on the structural performance of hardened properties of AAFA geopolymer concrete is not well addressed, especially on non-linear fracture behavior. This paper aims to present the reinforcement ratio effect on the flexural performance and non-linear fracture characteristics of alkali activated fly ash based geopolymer concrete beams. Sixteen finite element (FE) and four experimental models were used to study the effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance and non-linear fracture characteristics. Four groups of concrete specimens with an average compressive strength of 19.30 MPa, 32.60 MPa, 38.2,0 MPa, and 41.70 MPa were utilized under this study. To investigate the effect of reinforcement ratio on flexural performance of the beams, reinforcement ratios of 0.03, 0.042, 0.045, and 0.063 were used for each compressive strength class. The result showed that the ultimate load carrying capacity of the beam showed significant improvement by about 36.38% by increasing of reinforcement ratio from 0.03 to 0.063 by keeping the compressive strength of concrete constant. However, it was observed that the effect of compressive strength was not such substantial as reinforcement ratio in enhancing the ultimate load bearing capacity. The experimental result showed that the increase in ultimate load by keeping the reinforcement ratio constant is about 12.20% for different compressive strength. Furthermore, the crack formation in the concrete was highly associated with the tensile reinforcement ratio, i.e., smaller reinforcement ratio led to higher strain growth in the concrete. Moreover, the validation study between the numerical simulation and test results showed a good agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.