Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478793›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Esophagectomy in octogenarians: is it at a cost?

Sujata Ojha, Muhammad B Darwish, Annie L Benzie, Shankar Logarajah, Patrick J McLaren, Houssam Osman, Edward Cho, John Jay, D Rohan Jeyarajah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sujata OjhaDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Muhammad B DarwishDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Annie L BenzieDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Shankar LogarajahDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Patrick J McLarenDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Houssam OsmanDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Edward ChoDepartment of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma at Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
John JayDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
D Rohan JeyarajahDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Methodist Richardson Medical Center · USUniversity of North Texas · USMethodist Dallas Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma - Tulsa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical intervention in the geriatric population has a higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to frailty, comorbidities, and lack of compensatory physiologic reserve. The literature on esophagectomy in octogenarians is limited and there is concern about elderly patients being with-held surgery. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of esophagectomies for esophageal cancer in octogenarians to assess the safety of esophagectomy in this population. Methods: 145 transhiatal esophagectomies performed for esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed in this IRB approved study. Two aborted esophagectomies were excluded. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed. The octogenarian group was analyzed compared to patients younger than 80 years of age. Results: Among 143 esophagectomies, 136 patients were <80 years old while 7 were ≥80 years old. Octogenarians received significantly less neoadjuvant therapy compared to younger patients (42.9% vs 80.2%, p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was noted in complication rate, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), or mortality. However, octogenarians were found to have an increase in severity of complications compared to younger patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophagectomy can be performed in carefully selected octogenarians. This comes at a cost with increased severity of complications without an increase in complication rates or mortality. This data suggests that esophagectomy can be offered selectively to older patients with clear expectations and planning for the high risk of more severe post-operative complications.

Indexed as

Esophageal cancerEsophagectomyGeriatric surgeryOctogenarians

Identifiers

PMID36478793
PMCPMC9720024
OpenAlexW4310255216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.