ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
The relationship between health expenditure indicators and economic growth in OECD countries: A Driscoll-Kraay approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessing the health-agriculture nexus: evidence from super-efficiency DEA and panel models in OECD countries.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Apple production under changing climate conditions in major producing countries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From individual burden to social risk pooling: drivers of the declining out-of-pocket health expenditure share in China (2009-2024).International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Correlation study of indices on health status and social progress among Indian states.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Vaccine spending and economic recovery: OECD panel data analysis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
- Occupational status and health disparities among workers-An empirical study based on China health and nutrition survey data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Analyzing the impact of fiscal conditions on private health expenditures in OECD countries: a quantile ARDL investigation.International journal of health economics and management · 2024Article
- Immediate Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Heart and Kidney Transplantation and the Recovery Trends in 30 Developed and Less-Developed Countries.Annals of transplantation · 2024Article
- The effect of air pollution quality on lung cancer rates in middle-income and high-income countries: a panel data analysis approach.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Health-led growth hypothesis and health financing systems: an econometric synthesis for OECD countries.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A Comparative Analysis of the Determinants of Male, Female, and Total Life Expectancy in United States and China.American journal of men's healthArticle
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence, Health Expenditure and Digital Financial Inclusion on Life Expectancy.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The main purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between health expenditure indicators and economic growth in OECD countries. Methods: In this context, health expenditures and economic indicators data of 21 OECD countries were analyzed by the Driscoll-Kraay standard error approach within the scope of panel data analysis. While Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and income per capita were used as dependent variables, the amount of out-of-pocket health spending, per capita health expenditure, the amount of public health expenditure, the ratio of drug expenditures to gross domestic product, the share of current health expenditures in GDP were used as independent variables. Results: According to the results, in the model (Model 1) where real GDP level was used as the dependent variable, all health expenditure indicators were positively related to the economic growth. When the estimation results of Model 1 are examined, it is predicted that there will be an increase of 0.09% in GDP in case of a 1% increase in the share allocated to health services from GDP. In case of a 1% increase in the amount of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare, it is foreseen that there may be an increase of 0.04% in the real GDP. In the model (Model 2) where the per capita income variable is the dependent variable, it is seen that the increase in out- of-pocket health spending has a decreasing effect on the per capita income level, while the increase in public expenditures has an increasing effect on the per capita income level. From the findings of Model 2, it was found that if a 1% increase in the share of current health expenditures in GDP, there may be an increase of 0.06% in the amount of per capita income. Discussion: Concludingly, it is possible to say that that public resources allocated to health services play an important role in the economic growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.