Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478707›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2022

Comparative Efficacy of 3 Adjuvant Medications Used in Combination with Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Caesarian Section Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Reza Jouybar, Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi, Nazi Dehghani, Sara Sadeghi, Sahar Chehelgerdi Samani, Zahra Esmaeilinezhad, Farzaneh Masihi, Naeimehosadat Asmarian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reza JouybarAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zeinabsadat Fattahi SaraviAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Nazi DehghaniAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sara SadeghiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sahar Chehelgerdi SamaniAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Zahra EsmaeilinezhadAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Farzaneh MasihiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Naeimehosadat AsmarianAnesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A number of different medications are used in combination with intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean section anesthesia, but their relative efficacy has not been well established. Objective: To study the relative efficacy of adding either intrathecal fentanyl, intrathecal sufentanil, or intravenous acetaminophen-morphine-fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for pain control in elective cesarean section operations. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, 105 pregnant women eligible for cesarean section received 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in combination with 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil (group 1), 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl (group 2), and an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen, 5 mg morphine, and 100 μg fentanyl (group 3). Patients were assessed for analgesia, time to block, and adverse effects. Results: The 3 groups were similar in terms of the time to onset of sensory block and the duration of both sensory and motor block. Groups 1 and 3 differed significantly in the time to peak sensory block, whereas group 1 differed significantly from groups 2 and 3 in the time to peak motor block. The sensory block level reached T4 in most patients. Significant differences in pain (visual analog scale) were demonstrated between groups 1 and 3 at 5 minutes after spinal injection, between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the surgery and upon arrival to the recovery room, and between all groups in the recovery room. Conclusions: When used in addition to 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine, an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen-5 mg morphine-100 μg fentanyl was as efficient as either 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl or 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil in terms of sensory and motor block duration and produced a higher dermatomal level of sensory block. However, intrathecal sufentanil provided better anesthesia quality (less time to onset of motor block and peak sensory-motor block) and better pain control. (

Indexed as

acetaminophencesarean sectionfentanylspinal anesthesiasufentanil

Identifiers

PMID36478707
PMCPMC9720411
OpenAlexW4308743944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.