Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478700›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2022

The impact of different treatment protocols on achieved radiation doses of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a comparison between 2 fractions in 1 application and separate applications for each fraction.

Ester Jääskeläinen, Maarit Anttila, Jan-Erik Palmgren, Henna Kärkkäinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ester JääskeläinenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Maarit AnttilaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Jan-Erik PalmgrenRadiotherapy Department, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Henna KärkkäinenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Kuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare radiation doses achieved by image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma implemented with two different protocols. Material and methods: Medical records of 117 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with brachytherapy from 2009 to 2018 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had received previous external beam radio/chemotherapy. We performed magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive high-dose-rate brachytherapy delivered by intra-cavitary/interstitial applicators. Dose prescription was 7 Gy for four fractions within two weeks. Original schedule of brachytherapy was two fractions delivered on consecutive days with one applicator insertion; this process was repeated one week later (group 1, 54 patients). From 2015 onwards, another protocol of brachytherapy was mainly used, separately performing applicator insertions for each of the four administered fractions (group 2, 63 patients). Results: The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D Conclusions: In our experience, by performing an applicator insertion for each of the fractions, it is possible to correct the non-optimal position of the applicator immediately, and to deliver better doses for consecutive fractions. As a result, the planning aim is more often achieved, especially for large tumors.

Indexed as

cervical cancerimage-guided brachytherapyinterstitial brachytherapytreatment protocol

Identifiers

PMID36478700
PMCPMC9720687
OpenAlexW4311022729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.