Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478696›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2022

Predictors of poor cosmesis in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost after breast conservation surgery.

Nasim Feizi, Shole Arvandi, Maryam Feli, Fatemeh Mohammadian, Ziba Zahiri, Azin Shamsi, Ali Bagheri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thermally boosted interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in high-risk early-stage breast cancer conserving therapy - large cohort long-term results.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nasim FeiziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Shole ArvandiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Maryam FeliInterventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Fatemeh MohammadianInterventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ziba ZahiriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Azin ShamsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ali BagheriInterventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To identify patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors, which predict cosmesis in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) plus high-dose-rate (HDR) multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) boost after breast conservation surgery. Material and methods: At least 12 months after completion of radiotherapy, cosmetic outcomes were measured both objectively with BCCT.core software (using a front view digital photograph), and subjectively according to Harvard's criteria. MIBT dose fractionation regimen was 13.6 Gy/4 fractions (bid). To evaluate the correlation between cosmetic scores and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, WBI and MIBT plans were retrospectively analyzed, and ipsilateral skin and breast biologically equivalent dosimetric indices were recorded (α/β = 3 Gy). A multivariate ordinal logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled into this study. The median time from completion of radiation therapy to cosmesis scoring was 18 months. In evaluation with BCCT.core software, no patient was scored as excellent. Cosmesis was good in 18%, fair in 50%, and poor in 32% of patients. According to Harvard's scale, 10.5% of patients had excellent cosmesis, and 43%, 28.5%, and 18% of patients had good, fair, and poor scores, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with higher absolute MIBT V Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, MIBT breast V

Indexed as

boostbrachytherapybreast cancercosmetic outcomeradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID36478696
PMCPMC9720695
OpenAlexW4311022716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.