Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478694›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Comparing the pharmacology knowledge and performance of nurses and nursing students in the use of information resources in pediatrics wards: An observational study.

Amir Shahzeydi, Fatemeh Joonbakhsh, Najmeh Ajoodaniyan, Sajjad Khaksar, Faramarz Kalhor, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee, Rohollah Kalhor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amir ShahzeydiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Fatemeh JoonbakhshSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Najmeh AjoodaniyanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Sajjad KhaksarSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-5877
Faramarz KalhorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Ali Mohammad SabzghabaeeSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Rohollah KalhorHealth Services Management, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: One of the major duties of nurses is proper medication administration while maintaining patient safety, which requires sufficient knowledge and practice. Any gaps in knowledge used by nurses can lead to irreversible injury or death of the patient. This study is aimed to determine and compare the pharmacology knowledge and performance of nurses and nursing students in using the information resources in pediatrics wards. Method: This descriptive observational study was performed on 300 nurses and nursing students. Sources of knowledge and performance of nurses and nursing students were analyzed with researcher-made tools to determine their pharmaceutical knowledge, sources of knowledge, and attitudes by independent t-test, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson, and Spearman tests. Result: Three hundred questionnaires were examined. The clinical experience of nurses and students was their most important source of information in drug challenges for 33.7% of the participants. About 24.6% of nurses obtained the required information from specialized books on pediatric medicine. About 17.1% of the participants attained their knowledge from multiple sources (e.g. various available sources such as the Internet, pharmacy books, software, and their experiences and colleagues), while electronic sources and the Internet were the sources of knowledge for 15.5% and 7.7% of the nurses, respectively. Concerning nursing students, 6.3% used books, 41.7% considered colleagues (clinical experiences), 20.8% employed electronic resources, 22.8% used the Internet, and 9.1% relied on multiple sources. There were significant differences in the knowledge and performance of the nurses based on their source of pharmacological knowledge (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Most of the resources used in the hospital are not up-to-date and evidence-base, and the majority of nurses tend to rely on their clinical experience or their collegues information for medication administration rather than reading books or searching for up-to-date approaches and information. Nursing students also trust nurses' clinical experiences more than other sources provided for them including books and Internet. Some action should be taken by the managers for boosting the nurses' tendency for using up-to-date information resources.

Indexed as

knowledge resourcesmedicineNursenursing students

Identifiers

PMID36478694
PMCPMC9720831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.