Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478664›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2022

Applying a physiotherapy protocol to women during the active phase of labor improves obstetrical outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Cristine Homsi Jorge, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Therapeutic resources used by physiotherapists for the relief of labor pain: a cross-sectional study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Licia Santos SantanaDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin).
Rubneide Barreto Silva GalloDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin).
Silvana Maria QuintanaDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin).
Geraldo DuarteDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin).
Cristine Homsi JorgeHealth Sciences Applied to the Locomotor Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Cristine Homsi Jorge).
Alessandra Cristina MarcolinDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil (Licia Santos Santana, Rubneide Barreto Silva Gallo, Silvana Maria Quintana, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra Cristina Marcolin).
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLabor is a physiological process triggered by mechanical and hormonal events that promote uterine contractions to expel the fetus.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic childbirth care protocol in women in the active phase of labor in improving obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. STUDY

designThis was a randomized trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 80 low-risk primigravida women at the end of pregnancy admitted at the beginning of the active phase of labor participated in the study. The participants were divided into an experimental group (n=40) and a control group (n=40). Women in the experimental group received 4 interventions: ambulation at 4 to 6 cm of cervical dilation, alternation of maternal postures, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at 6 to 7 cm, and a warm shower bath at >7 cm. The control group received only routine obstetrical care during labor. The parturient could request pharmacologic analgesia at any time during the study. The main outcome measures were the duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor, the duration of the expulsive phase of labor, and the prevalence of labor dystocia as assessed by the partograph. The researchers collected other maternal and neonatal data from official birth records.

resultsThe parturients who received the nonpharmacologic protocol had a shorter active phase of the first stage of labor (444 minutes in the control group and 373 minutes in the experimental group;

conclusionThe implementation of a sequential nonpharmacologic protocol composed of ambulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with change of upright positions, and warm shower bath has the potential to reduce labor pain, as reflected in decreased and delayed use of pharmacologic analgesia and reduced duration of the active phase of labor and dystocia rates. Maternity hospitals should provide this protocol, and women should be encouraged to request this childbirth care protocol.

Indexed as

active phase of labordystocialabor painnonpharmacologic resourcespharmacologic analgesiarandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36478664
PMCPMC9720489
OpenAlexW4308661085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.