ArticleESC heart failure2023
Genetic aetiology distribution of 398 foetuses with congenital heart disease in the prenatal setting.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological Advances in Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Hereditary Diseases in Preconception and Prenatal Settings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Whole Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnostics: The Danish Approach to Guideline Formation and Implementation Within Public Healthcare.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Inherited variants in autosomal dominant disease genes are a significant cause of fetal structural anomalies.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield of exome and genome sequencing for critically ill pediatric cardiac patients.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Congenital Heart Anomalies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prenatal diagnostic value of medium-coverage WGS and clinical Exome sequencing in fetal congenital heart disease.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Exome and Genome Sequencing for Critically Ill Pediatric Cardiac Patients.Research square · 2025Article
- Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Efficiency of copy number variation sequencing combined with karyotyping in fetuses with congenital heart disease and the following outcomes.Molecular cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Contribution of genetic variants to congenital heart defects in both singleton and twin fetuses: a Chinese cohort study.Molecular cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Prenatal finding of isolated ventricular septal defect: genetic association, outcomes and counseling.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Genetic aetiology distribution of 398 foetuses with congenital heart disease in the prenatal setting.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Analysis of copy number variations and possible candidate genes in spontaneous abortion by copy number variation sequencing.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCopy number variant-sequencing (CNV-seq) and exome sequencing (ES) have been used as powerful tools in understanding the role of genetic variants in congenital heart diseases (CHDs). A few previous large cohort studies have utilized CNV-seq and ES to investigate prenatally diagnosed CHD. Here, we sought to determine the value of CNV-seq and ES for genetic evaluation of foetal CHDs. METHODS AND
resultsWe recruited 398 pregnant women diagnosed with CHDs between 8 January 2017 and 30 November 2020. CNV-seq and ES were performed on foetal and parent samples. CHD cases were classified following the guidelines of the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code and the Tenth and Eleventh Revisions of the International Classification of Diseases. Data on aneuploids (AUP), pathogenic CNVs (pCNVs), and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were collected and compared, following appropriate procedures. We identified genetic abnormalities in 129 (32.41%) foetuses. These abnormalities included AUP (10.80%), pCNVs (13.32%), and SNVs (8.04%). ES analysis yielded higher SNVs in cases without AUP or pCNVs. Non-isolated CHDs were associated with higher genetic abnormalities than isolated CHDs, mainly due to AUP differences between the two groups. The prevalence of genetic defects was the highest in foetuses with atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD), left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), and conotruncal defects (CTD). AVSD and anomalies of atrioventricular junctions and valves were associated with AUP abnormalities. CTD, anomalies of extrapericardial arterial trunks, and anomalies of the ventricular outflow tracts were the most common CHD categories diagnosed using CNVs. The most common CHDs associated with single ventricle (SV) abnormalities were heterotaxy (Hex) (14.89%), LVOTO (14.58%), and ventricular septal defect (VSD) (26.67%, 4/15). Although the ES yields were higher than CNV-seq for VSD (44.4%, 4/9), LVOTO (20%, 7/35), Hex (14.89%, 7/47), and CTD (9.1%, 11/121), its diagnostic yield did not increase for SV (6.7%, 1/15), AVSD (3.8%, 1/26), or right ventricular obstruction defects (2.6%, 1/38). The most common mutations were observed in KMT2D, CHD7, and NOTCH1.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study to investigate the incidence of SNVs using ES in foetal CHD. CNV-seq and ES identified genetic abnormalities in nearly 1/3 of foetal CHD cases. Thus, CNV-seq and ES can provide clinically relevant information for pregnancy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.