Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478561›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Outpatient Psychotherapy Before and After the Reform of the Psychotherapy Directive of 2017: Data from Practices with and without Psycho-Oncologic Specialty].

Deborah Engesser, Lena Maier, Martina Mittag, Klaus Lang, Almut Nagel-Brotzler, Bernhild Wirp, Jörg Kobes, Susanne Singer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deborah EngesserInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik | Abteilung Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lena MaierInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik | Abteilung Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Martina MittagPsychotherapeutische Praxis, Stuttgart, Germany.
Klaus LangPsychotherapeutische Praxis, München, Germany.
Almut Nagel-BrotzlerPsychotherapeutische Praxis, Bretten, Germany.
Bernhild WirpPsychotherapeutische Praxis, Braunschweig, Germany.
Jörg KobesPsychotherapeutische Praxis, Jena, Germany.
Susanne SingerInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik | Abteilung Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

Die Studie wurde gefördert durch den Innovationsfonds des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses 01VSF19003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reform of the German psychotherapy directive in 2017 resulted in several changes for non-hospital-based psychotherapists. We examined whether patients received psychotherapy following their initial consultation more frequently after the reform than before.

methodsUsing records from psychotherapy practices in a retrospective cohort study, we investigated the frequency of a psychotherapy after the patients' initial consultation. We compared a time frame of three years before and after the reform. A potential association between reform and psychotherapy received was analysed via logistic regression.

resultsOur analysis comprised 1548 records from 9 psychotherapy practices, consisting of 755 records before and 793 records after the reform. Before the reform, 40% (n=303) of the patients who had an initial consultation went on to receive psychotherapy. After the reform, 46% (n=360) of initial consultations were followed by psychotherapy (including acute care). The logistic regression analysis showed a 36% increased probability of receiving psychotherapy after an initial consultation after the reform in comparison to before the reform (odds ratio 1.36 after vs. before reform, 95% confidence interval 1.09 - 1.68).

conclusionOur results indicate a higher chance of receiving psychotherapy after an initial consultation after the reform compared to before the reform. Our data do not contain information as to whether the absolute number of psychotherapy appointments in the practices increased after the reform.

Indexed as

OutpatientsPsychotherapyGermanyHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36478561
PMCPMC11248850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.