Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478527›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2022

Harnessing a knowledge translation framework to implement an undergraduate medical education intervention: A longitudinal study.

Martine Chamberland, Jean Setrakian, Linda Bergeron, Lara Varpio, Christina St-Onge, Aliki Thomas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martine ChamberlandDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. martine.chamberland@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2881-1676
Jean SetrakianDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-9084
Linda BergeronCenter for Health Sciences Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-7316
Lara VarpioCenter for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-4341
Christina St-OngeDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5313-0456
Aliki ThomasSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy and Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-6609
Université de Sherbrooke · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementation of evidence-informed educational interventions (EEI) involves applying and adapting theoretical and scientific knowledge to a specific context. Knowledge translation (KT) approaches can both facilitate and structure the process. The purpose of this paper is to describe lessons learned from applying a KT approach to help implement an EEI for clinical reasoning in medical students.

methodsUsing the Knowledge to Action framework, we designed and implemented an EEI intended to support the development of students' clinical reasoning skills in a renewed medical curriculum. Using mixed-methods design, we monitored students' engagement with the EEI longitudinally through a platform log; we conducted focus groups with students and stakeholders, and observed the unfolding of the implementation and its continuation. Data are reported according to six implementation outcomes: Fidelity, Feasibility, Appropriateness, Acceptability, Adoption, and Penetration.

resultsStudents spent a mean of 24 min on the activity (fidelity outcome) with a high completion rate (between 75% and 95%; feasibility outcome) of the entire activity each time it was done. Focus group data from students and stakeholders suggest that the activity was acceptable, appropriate, feasible, adopted and well-integrated into the curriculum. DISCUSSION: Through the process we observed the importance of having a structuring framework, of working closely and deliberatively with stakeholders and students, of building upon concurrent evaluations in order to adapt iteratively the EEI to the local context and, while taking students' needs into consideration, of upholding the EEI's core educational principles.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansLongitudinal StudiesTranslational Science, BiomedicalClinical reasoningEvidence-informed educational interventionImplementationKnowledge translation

Identifiers

PMID36478527
PMCPMC9743946
OpenAlexW4311501676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.