Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478525›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2022

Medical students' career decision-making stress during clinical clerkships.

Daan A H Fris, Annelies E M van Vianen, Jessie Koen, Matthijs de Hoog, Anne P J de Pagter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Career coaching to support medical student career decision-making: a randomized controlled trial.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daan A H FrisDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.h.fris@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0676-0495
Annelies E M van VianenWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jessie KoenWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthijs de HoogDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne P J de PagterDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany medical students experience career decision-making stress in the final phase of training. Yet, the factors that induce or reduce career decision-making stress and how progression in their clerkships relates to these factors are unknown. This knowledge gap limits the possibilities for medical schools to develop and implement interventions targeting students' career decision-making stress. This study explores content, process, and context factors that may affect career decision-making stress.

methodsUsing cross-sectional survey data from medical master students (n = 507), we assessed content (future work self), process (choice irreversibility, time pressure, career decision-making self-efficacy), and context (supervisory support, medical school support, study load, competition) factors and their relationships with career decision-making stress. The hypothesized relationships were tested with structural equation modelling.

resultsA clearer future work self and higher career decision self-efficacy were associated with lower career decision-making stress, while experienced time pressure, competition, and study load were associated with higher career decision-making stress. Choice-irreversibility beliefs, supervisory support, and medical school support were unrelated to career decision-making stress. As students' clerkships progressed, they gained a clearer future work self, but also experienced more time pressure. DISCUSSION: Clinical clerkships help students to form a clearer future work self, which can diminish career decision-making stress. Yet, students also experience more time pressure as the period of clerkships lengthens, which can increase career decision-making stress. A school climate of high competition and study load seems to foster career decision-making stress, while school support hardly seems effective in diminishing this stress.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCareer choiceCareer decision-makingCareer decision-making stressCareer developmentClinical clerkshipsSpecialty choice

Identifiers

PMID36478525
PMCPMC9734734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.