Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478463›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2023

Biochemical surveillance versus clinical observation of term infants born after prolonged rupture of membranes - A quality assurance initiative.

Emma Rød, Vilde Solberg, Eydís Oddsdóttir Stenersen, Håvard Tetlie Garberg, Anders Batman Mjelle, Per Arne Tølløfsrud, Arild Erland Rønnestad, Anne Lee Solevåg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emma RødFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-706X
Vilde SolbergFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eydís Oddsdóttir StenersenFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard Tetlie GarbergDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway.
Anders Batman MjelleDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4927-7452
Per Arne TølløfsrudDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arild Erland RønnestadInstitute of clinical medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Lee SolevågDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-7169
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NODrammen Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

Eydis Oddsdóttir Stenersen was supported by the Research Council of Norway through the Medical Student Research Program at University of Oslo, Norway
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine whether biochemical surveillance vs clinical observation of term infants with prolonged rupture of membranes as a risk factor for early-onset sepsis is associated with differences in patient trajectories in maternity and neonatal intensive care units.

methodsA retrospective study of live-born infants with gestational age ≥ 37 + 0 weeks born after prolonged rupture of membranes (≥24 h) in four Norwegian hospitals 2017-2019. Two hospitals used biochemical surveillance, and two used predominantly clinical observation to identify early-onset sepsis cases.

resultsThe biochemical surveillance hospitals had more C-reactive protein measurements (p < 0.001), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (p < 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (p < 0.001). Hospitals using predominantly clinical observation initiated antibiotic treatment earlier in infants with suspected early-onset sepsis (p = 0.04) but not in infants fulfilling early-onset sepsis diagnostic criteria (p = 0.09). There was no difference in antibiotic treatment duration (p = 0.59), fraction of infants fulfilling early-onset sepsis diagnostic criteria (p = 0.49) or length of hospitalisation (p = 0.30), and no early-onset sepsis-related adverse outcomes.

conclusionThe biochemical surveillance hospitals had more C-reactive protein measurements, but there was no difference in antibiotic treatment duration, early-onset sepsis cases, length of hospitalisation or adverse outcomes. Personnel resources needed for clinical surveillance should be weighed against the limitation of potentially painful procedures.

Indexed as

Premature Rupture of Fetal MembranesSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinantibioticsC-reactive proteinearly-onset sepsisprolonged rupture of membranesterm infant

Identifiers

PMID36478463
PMCPMC10107997
OpenAlexW4311934755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.