Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478078›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Ischemic preconditioning and exercise performance: are the psychophysiological responses underestimated?

Moacir Marocolo, Rodrigo Hohl, Rhaí André Arriel, Gustavo R Mota

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moacir MarocoloDepartment of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil. isamjf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-2534
Rodrigo HohlDepartment of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3194-9289
Rhaí André ArrielDepartment of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-9667
Gustavo R MotaExercise Science, Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6109-0658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The findings of the ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on exercise performance are mixed regarding types of exercise, protocols and participants' training status. Additionally, studies comparing IPC with sham (i.e., low-pressure cuff) and/or control (i.e., no cuff) interventions are contentious. While studies comparing IPC versus a control group generally show an IPC significant effect on performance, sham interventions show the same performance improvement. Thus, the controversy over IPC ergogenic effect may be due to limited discussion on the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying cuff maneuvers. Psychophysiology is the study of the interrelationships between mind, body and behavior, and mental processes are the result of the architecture of the nervous system and voluntary exercise is a behavior controlled by the central command modulated by sensory inputs. Therefore, this narrative review aims to associate potential IPC-induced positive effects on performance with sensorimotor pathways (e.g., sham influencing bidirectional body-brain integration), hemodynamic and metabolic changes (i.e., blood flow occlusion reperfusion cycles). Overall, IPC and sham-induced mechanisms on exercise performance may be due to a bidirectional body-brain integration of muscle sensory feedback to the central command resulting in delayed time to exhaustion, alterations on perceptions and behavior. Additionally, hemodynamic responses and higher muscle oxygen extraction may justify the benefits of IPC on muscle contractile function.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningExerciseExercise TestHumansMuscle, SkeletalPsychophysiologyReperfusionBlood flow restrictionErgogenic aidPhysiological mechanismsSports

Identifiers

PMID36478078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.