Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36478075›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2023

A Practical Quality Assurance Procedure for Data Acquisitions in Preclinical Simultaneous PET/MR Systems.

Alan Courteau, John McGrath, Paul Michael Walker, Benoît Presles, Ruslan Garipov, Alexandre Cochet, François Brunotte, Jean-Marc Vrigneaud

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan CourteauImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France. alan.courteau@u-bourgogne.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-1334
John McGrathMR Solutions Ltd, Guildford, GU4 7WA, UK.
Paul Michael WalkerImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.
Benoît PreslesImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.
Ruslan GaripovMR Solutions Ltd, Guildford, GU4 7WA, UK.
Alexandre CochetImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.
François BrunotteImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.
Jean-Marc VrigneaudImViA Laboratory, EA 7535, University of Burgundy, 21000, Dijon, France.
Université de Bourgogne · FRMaterials Solutions (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of preclinical simultaneous PET/MR imaging systems has been increasing in recent years. Therefore, this technique is progressively moving from the hands of pure physicists towards those of scientists more involved in pharmacology and biology. Unfortunately, these combined scanners can be prone to artefacts and deviation of their characteristics under the influence of external factors or mutual interference between subsystems. This may compromise the image quality as well as the quantitative aspects of PET and MR data. Hence, quality assurance is crucial to avoid loss of animals and experiments. A possible risk to the acceptance of quality control by preclinical teams is that the complexity and duration of this quality control are increased by the addition of MR and PET tests. To avoid this issue, we have selected over the past 5 years, simple tests that can be easily and quickly performed each day before starting an animal PET/MR acquisition. These tests can be performed by the person in charge of the experiment even if this person has a limited expertise in instrumentation and performance evaluation. In addition to these daily tests, other tests are suggested for an advanced system follow-up at a lower frequency. In the present paper, the proposed tests are sorted by periodicity from daily to annual. Besides, we have selected test materials that are available at moderate cost either commercially or through 3D printing.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAnimalsArtifactsPhantoms, ImagingMRIPETPreclinical imagingQuality controlSimultaneous imaging

Identifiers

PMID36478075
PMCPMC10172259
OpenAlexW4310950448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.