Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477855›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023

Racial survival disparities in head and neck cancer clinical trials.

Jeffrey C Liu, Brian L Egleston, Elizabeth Blackman, Camille Ragin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Disparities in Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey C LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine of Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-0905
Brian L EglestonDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth BlackmanCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Camille RaginCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
TUFCCC/HC Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health PartnershipU54CA221704 · NCI · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI Joel Erblich, Jennifer S Ford · 2018 to 2026
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS U54 CA221704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival disparities between Black and White head and neck cancer patients are well documented, with access to care and socioeconomic status as major contributors. We set out to assess the role of self-reported race in head and neck cancer by evaluating treatment outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trials, where access to care and socioeconomic status confounders are minimized.

methodsClinical trial data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies were obtained. Studies were included if they were therapeutic trials that employed survival as an endpoint. Studies that did not report survival as an endpoint were excluded; 7 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Studies were included for study. For each Black patient enrolled in a clinical trial, a study arm-matched White patient was used as a control.

resultsA total of 468 Black participants were identified and matched with 468 White study arm-specific controls. White participants had better outcomes than Black participants in 60% of matched pairs (P < .001). Black participants were consistently more likely to have worse outcomes. When outcomes were measured by progression-free survival or disease-free survival, the failure rate was statistically significantly higher in Black participants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, P < .001). Failure was largely due to locoregional failure, and Black participants were at higher risk (subdistribution HR =1.51, P = .002). The development of distant metastasis within the paired cohorts was not statistically significantly different.

conclusionIn this study of clinical trial participants using self-reported race, Black participants consistently had worse outcomes in comparison to study arm-specific White controls. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and to explore causes underlying this disparity.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Status DisparitiesSurvival RateBlack PeopleClinical Trials as TopicHealthcare DisparitiesHumansProportional Hazards ModelsTreatment OutcomeWhite People

Identifiers

PMID36477855
PMCPMC9996207
OpenAlexW4310954837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.