ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023
Racial survival disparities in head and neck cancer clinical trials.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer in the United States.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- The impact of genomic ancestry on tumor genomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Impact of the surgery to radiotherapy interval on oncological outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Global burden and cross-country inequalities in head and neck cancer from 1992 to 2021: results from the global burden of disease study.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Trial Enrollment and Survival Disparities Among Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality and Mediating Effects of Sociodemographic, Clinicopathologic, and Treatment Factors.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Treatment Outcomes Differ for Racial and Ethnic Minorities with Advanced-Stage Laryngeal Cancer: A Florida Cancer Data System Analysis.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Disparities in Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Tumor Cell Stemness and Stromal Cell Features Contribute to Oral Cancer Outcome Disparity in Black Americans.Cancers · 2024Article
- Exploring the impact of GSTM1 as a novel molecular determinant of survival in head and neck cancer patients of African descent.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Article
- Population-Based Prognostic Models for Head and Neck Cancers Using National Cancer Registry Data from Taiwan.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2024Article
- Characterization of a Diverse Set of Conditionally Reprogrammed Head and Neck Cancer Cell Cultures.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Survival Disparities among Cancer Patients Based on Mobility Patterns: A Population-Based Study.Health data science · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvival disparities between Black and White head and neck cancer patients are well documented, with access to care and socioeconomic status as major contributors. We set out to assess the role of self-reported race in head and neck cancer by evaluating treatment outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trials, where access to care and socioeconomic status confounders are minimized.
methodsClinical trial data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies were obtained. Studies were included if they were therapeutic trials that employed survival as an endpoint. Studies that did not report survival as an endpoint were excluded; 7 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Studies were included for study. For each Black patient enrolled in a clinical trial, a study arm-matched White patient was used as a control.
resultsA total of 468 Black participants were identified and matched with 468 White study arm-specific controls. White participants had better outcomes than Black participants in 60% of matched pairs (P < .001). Black participants were consistently more likely to have worse outcomes. When outcomes were measured by progression-free survival or disease-free survival, the failure rate was statistically significantly higher in Black participants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, P < .001). Failure was largely due to locoregional failure, and Black participants were at higher risk (subdistribution HR =1.51, P = .002). The development of distant metastasis within the paired cohorts was not statistically significantly different.
conclusionIn this study of clinical trial participants using self-reported race, Black participants consistently had worse outcomes in comparison to study arm-specific White controls. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and to explore causes underlying this disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.