Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477833›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Insights from incorporating quantum computing into drug design workflows.

Bayo Lau, Prashant S Emani, Jackson Chapman, Lijing Yao, Tarsus Lam, Paul Merrill, Jonathan Warrell, Mark B Gerstein, Hugo Y K Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A primer for quantum computing and its applications to healthcare and biomedical research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Future of Drug Development with Quantum Computing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bayo LauHypaHealth, HypaHub Inc., San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Prashant S EmaniProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Jackson ChapmanProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Lijing YaoHypaHealth, HypaHub Inc., San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Tarsus LamHypaHealth, HypaHub Inc., San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Paul MerrillHypaHealth, HypaHub Inc., San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Jonathan WarrellProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Mark B GersteinProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Hugo Y K LamHypaHealth, HypaHub Inc., San Jose, CA 95128, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0564-6105

Funding

Discovery and validation of neuronal enhancers as development of psychiatric disorders supplementU01MH116492 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GERSTEIN, MARK BENDER, WENG, ZHIPING · 2018 to 2023
$6.2M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWhile many quantum computing (QC) methods promise theoretical advantages over classical counterparts, quantum hardware remains limited. Exploiting near-term QC in computer-aided drug design (CADD) thus requires judicious partitioning between classical and quantum calculations.

resultsWe present HypaCADD, a hybrid classical-quantum workflow for finding ligands binding to proteins, while accounting for genetic mutations. We explicitly identify modules of our drug-design workflow currently amenable to replacement by QC: non-intuitively, we identify the mutation-impact predictor as the best candidate. HypaCADD thus combines classical docking and molecular dynamics with quantum machine learning (QML) to infer the impact of mutations. We present a case study with the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) protease and associated mutants. We map a classical machine-learning module onto QC, using a neural network constructed from qubit-rotation gates. We have implemented this in simulation and on two commercial quantum computers. We find that the QML models can perform on par with, if not better than, classical baselines. In summary, HypaCADD offers a successful strategy for leveraging QC for CADD. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Jupyter Notebooks with Python code are freely available for academic use on GitHub: https://www.github.com/hypahub/hypacadd_notebook. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

COVID-19SoftwareComputing MethodologiesDrug DesignHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationQuantum TheorySARS-CoV-2Workflow

Identifiers

PMID36477833
PMCPMC9825754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.