Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477768›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Diagnostic performance of image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: prospective pilot study.

Elisabetta M C Rossi, Alessandra Invento, Filippo Pesapane, Eleonora Pagan, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Nicola Fusco, Konstantinos Venetis, Valeria Dominelli, Chiara Trentin, Enrico Cassano and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ultrafast Breast MRI: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabetta M C RossiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra InventoBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Filippo PesapaneBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-5054
Eleonora PaganDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo BagnardiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy.
Konstantinos VenetisDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy.
Valeria DominelliBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Chiara TrentinBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Laura GilardiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Manuelita MazzaDivision of Medical Senology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Matteo LazzeroniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-4002
Francesca De LorenziDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Pietro CaldarellaBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra De ScalziBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Antonia GirardiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Claudia SangalliData Management, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca AlbertiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Virgilio SacchiniBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Viviana GalimbertiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Paolo VeronesiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITData Management (Italy) · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of the tumour bed, performed after neoadjuvant therapy, is increasingly being used to assess residual cancer and to potentially identify to identify pathological complete response (pCR). In this study, the accuracy of preoperative VABB specimens was assessed and compared with surgical specimens in patients with triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive invasive ductal breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. As a secondary endpoint, the performance of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast and PET-CT for response prediction was assessed.

methodsThis single-institution prospective pilot study enrolled patients from April 2018 to April 2021 with a complete response on imaging (iCR) who subsequently underwent VABB before surgery. Those with a pCR at VABB were included in the primary analysis of the accuracy of VABB. The performance of imaging (MRI and PET-CT) was analysed for prediction of a pCR considering both patients with an iCR and those with residual disease at postneoadjuvant therapy imaging.

resultsTwenty patients were included in the primary analysis. The median age was 44 (range 35-51) years. At surgery, 18 of 20 patients showed a complete response (accuracy 90 (95 per cent exact c.i. 68 to 99) per cent). Only two patients showed residual ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and 3 respectively. In the secondary analysis, accuracy was similar for MRI and PET-CT (77 versus 78 per cent; P = 0.76).

conclusionVABB in patients with an iCR might be a promising method to select patients for de-escalation of surgical treatment in triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer. The present results support such an approach and should inform the design of future trials on de-escalation of surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultBreastFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPilot ProjectsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36477768
PMCPMC10364486
OpenAlexW4310938228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.