ArticlePloS one2022
Bi-dimensional principal gene feature selection from big gene expression data.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amogel: a multi-omics classification framework using associative graph neural networks with prior knowledge for biomarker identification.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Computational methods in glaucoma research: Current status and future outlook.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2023Review
- Feature selection for high dimensional microarray gene expression data via weighted signal to noise ratio.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression sample data, which usually contains massive expression profiles of genes, is commonly used for disease related gene analysis. The selection of relevant genes from huge amount of genes is always a fundamental process in applications of gene expression data. As more and more genes have been detected, the size of gene expression data becomes larger and larger; this challenges the computing efficiency for extracting the relevant and important genes from gene expression data. In this paper, we provide a novel Bi-dimensional Principal Feature Selection (BPFS) method for efficiently extracting critical genes from big gene expression data. It applies the principal component analysis (PCA) method on sample and gene domains successively, aiming at extracting the relevant gene features and reducing redundancies while losing less information. The experimental results on four real-world cancer gene expression datasets show that the proposed BPFS method greatly reduces the data size and achieves a nearly double processing speed compared to the counterpart methods, while maintaining better accuracy and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.