ArticleScientific reports2022
Statistical modeling for Ree-Eyring nanofluid flow in a conical gap between porous rotating surfaces with entropy generation and Hall Effect.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics informed neural networks for fluid flow analysis with repetitive parameter initialization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational framework of cobalt ferrite and silver-based hybrid nanofluid over a rotating disk and cone: a comparative study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The attention of the current study is on the flow of a non-Newtonian incompressible Cu-Water nanofluid flow. The water is assumed as base fluid, while copper is used as nanoparticles. The Ree-Eyring prototype describes the performance of non-Newtonian nanofluids. There is a conical gap that nanofluid flow fills among the plane disc and the cone's stationary/rotational porous faces. Additionally taken into account are heat, mass transfer, and entropy production. The given mathematical model is unique due to the effects of a vertically applied Hall Effect, Ohmic dissipation, viscous dissipation, and chemical processes. The Ree-Eyring fluid constitutive equations, as well as the cylindrical coordinates, have been interpreted. The model equations for motion, heat, and concentration can be changed in the collection of non-linear ODEs by employing the applicable similarity transform. This method allocates a couple of nonlinear ODEs relating to velocity, temperature, and concentration distributions. The shooting scheme (bvp4c technique) is used to solve these equations numerically. Statistical analysis like probable error, correlation, and regression are exploited. The probable error is estimated to compute the consistency of the calculated correlation features. The theoretical data is analyzed in both graphical and tabular forms. The modeled parameters like, magnetic number, porosity parameter, Eckert number, chemical reaction parameter, Brownian motion parameter, thermophoretic parameter, Schmidt number, Hall recent parameter, radiation parameter, and volume fraction are discussed in details graphically and theoretically. The outcomes indicate that the velocity components are greater for greater values of nanoparticle volume fraction and Weissenberg number, whereas for enormous values of magnetic and porosity parameters, the velocity components fall.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.