Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477592›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Subjective age of acquisition norms for 1604 English words by Spanish L2 speakers of English and their relationship with lexico-semantic, affective, sociolinguistic and proficiency variables.

Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado, José Antonio Hinojosa, Marc Guasch, Carlos Romero-Rivas, Lucía Sabater, Paz Suárez-Coalla, Pilar Ferré

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Rodriguez-CuadradoDepartamento Interfacultativo de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Formación del Profesorado y Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente, n° 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain. sara.rodriguezcuadrado@uam.es.
José Antonio HinojosaInstituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marc GuaschDepartamento de Psicología y CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Carlos Romero-RivasDepartamento Interfacultativo de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Formación del Profesorado y Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente, n° 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía SabaterDepartamento Interfacultativo de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Formación del Profesorado y Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Francisco Tomás y Valiente, n° 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Paz Suárez-CoallaDepartamento de Psicología y Grupo de Investigación INCO, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Pilar FerréDepartamento de Psicología y CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidad Nebrija · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psycholinguistic studies have shown that there are many variables implicated in language comprehension and production. At the lexical level, subjective age of acquisition (AoA), the estimate of the age at which a word is acquired, is key for stimuli selection in psycholinguistic studies. AoA databases in English are often used when testing a variety of phenomena in second language (L2) speakers of English. However, these have limitations, as the norms are not provided by the target population (L2 speakers of English) but by native English speakers. In this study, we asked native Spanish L2 speakers of English to provide subjective AoA ratings for 1604 English words, and investigated whether factors related to 14 lexico-semantic and affective variables, both in Spanish and English, and to the speakers' profile (i.e., sociolinguistic variables and L2 proficiency), were related to the L2 AoA ratings. We used boosted regression trees, an advanced form of regression analysis based on machine learning and boosting algorithms, to analyse the data. Our results showed that the model accounted for a relevant proportion of deviance (58.56%), with the English AoA provided by native English speakers being the strongest predictor for L2 AoA. Additionally, L2 AoA correlated with L2 reaction times. Our database is a useful tool for the research community running psycholinguistic studies in L2 speakers of English. It adds knowledge about which factors-linked to the characteristics of both the linguistic stimuli and the speakers-affect L2 subjective AoA. The database and the data can be downloaded from: https://osf.io/gr8xd/?view_only=73b01dccbedb4d7897c8d104d3d68c46 .

Indexed as

MultilingualismSemanticsDatabases, FactualHumansLanguagePsycholinguisticsReaction TimeAge of acquisitionBoosted regression treesSecond language speakers

Identifiers

PMID36477592
PMCPMC10700429
OpenAlexW4310954481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.