ArticleJAMA network open2022
Characteristics and Treatment Rate of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Informing the Equitable Implementation of Hepatitis C Interventions: Cost-Effectiveness Modeling in Rural Populations of People Who Inject Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Variations in the viral hepatitis C prevalence and treatment status by material hardship and cumulative risk among people who inject drugs.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Epidemiology and control of hepatitis C virus infection in Brunei Darussalam: a retrospective cohort study.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of One-Time Universal Childhood Hepatitis C Screening in the United States.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2026Article
- The Journey to Hepatitis C Elimination in Taiwan: Insights From the Hemodialysis Population.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Using prescription medication utilization trends to evaluate health system resilience and inform future emergency preparedness.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Hepatitis C Infection.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- From Guidelines to Real-Time Conversation: Expert-Validated Retrieval-Augmented and Fine-Tuned GPT-4 for Hepatitis C Management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Article
- Review
- Sex Differences in Risk of Adverse Liver Events in Patients With Cirrhosis.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Racial and Sociodemographic Disparities in Hepatitis C Treatment at an Urban Academic Medical Center, 2018-2023.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Simplified Treatment of Hepatitis C during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis of the British Columbia Hepatitis C Network.Canadian liver journal · 2025Article
- Medicaid and Medicare Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Medications for Patients With Hepatitis C.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Global disparities in access to hepatitis C medicines before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ARIMA-based interrupted time series analysis.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Delayed Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Infection: Results of a Nationwide US Study.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region: burden, trends, challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
- Trends in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mortality Rates in the US and Projections Through 2040.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Global epidemiology, natural history, maternal-to-child transmission, and treatment with DAA of pregnant women with HCV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Clinical data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rates in the United States are sparse. Objective: To evaluate HCV treatment rates in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the deidentified Optum Cliniformatics Data Mart Database (2014-2021) on patients with HCV in the DAA and COVID-19 eras. The database includes patients with private health insurance in the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: The treatment rate and changes over time were assessed with adjusted log-binomial regression, and factors associated with treatment were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 133 348 patients with HCV (79 567 [59.7%] men; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [12.3] years; 4448 [3.3%] Asian, 24 662 [18.5%] Black, and 74 750 [56.1%] White individuals) were included; 38 180 (26.8%) had HCV RNA data, and of those, 20 277 (53.1%) had positive HCV RNA. Overall, 13 214 patients with positive HCV RNA tests (65.2%) received DAA treatment; 6456 of 6634 patients treated with DAAs (97.3%) achieved sustained virologic response. After adjusting for age, sex, and race and ethnicity, the treatment rate in 2018 was 0.5 times greater than the rate in 2014 (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.42-1.59) but declined after 2018, decreasing from 64.8% to 61.2%, and especially after 2019, when it decreased to less than 60% (P < .001). The number of patients with viremic HCV identified in between April 2020 and March 2021 also decreased to 496 from 2761 and 3258 in the preceding 2 years. Receiving care from a gastroenterologist or infectious disease specialist with advanced care practitioner (ie, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist) was independently associated with greater odds of DAA treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were 31% less likely to receive treatment compared with those without (aOR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, less than two-thirds of insured patients with viremic HCV received DAA treatment, with declines in both the treatment rate and the number of viremic HCV diagnoses since 2019 and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further efforts are needed to increase HCV diagnosis and treatment, especially for those with cirrhosis and HCC. An urgent call for nationwide actions to improve access to DAA treatment, community outreach programs, and specialists through referral pipelines is needed in the United States to stay on track to meet the World Health Organization goal of reducing the burden of viral hepatitis with the eventual goal to eliminate viral hepatitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.