Trial reportJAMA network open2022
Effect of a Multicomponent Intervention Delivered on a Web-Based Platform on Hypertension Control: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of digital health interventions for telemedicine/telehealth for managing blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of the efficacy and safety of carbon nanoparticles-guided lymph node dissection in gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of a WeChat-Based Multimodal Digital Transformation Management Model in New-Onset Mild to Moderate Hypertension: Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Learning Health System Implementation: Building a Hub-and-Spoke Model for Hypertension Management Through the QI Hub.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Surrogate Perspectives on the Communication and Support Processes That Enable Them as Active Decision-Makers Across Chronic Critical Illness.CHEST critical care · 2026Article
- A realist review to understand the complexity of effective management of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Lifestyle Interventions and Pharmacological Adherence in the Management of Hypertension Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Nursing research and practice · 2026Review
- Providers' Perspective on the Feasibility of Digital Self-Management of Blood Pressure in Refugees: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Community based cohort studies in China: critical insights for shaping the future of population and public health.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Long-term exposure to residential greenness and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions in improving hypertensive outcomes among patients with uncontrolled hypertension: A systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Telemedicine Integrated Care Versus In-Person Care Mode for Patients With Short Stature: Comprehensive Comparison of a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Digital Health Platform for Improving the Effect of the Active Health Management of Chronic Diseases in the Community: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Review
- A retrospective cohort study of a community-based primary care program's effects on pharmacotherapy quality in low-income Peruvians with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Web-based interventions to improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The predictive validity of a Brain Care Score for dementia and stroke: data from the UK Biobank cohort.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The prevalence of hypertension is high and still increasing across the world, while the control rate remains low in many countries. Emerging technology, such as telemedicine, may offer additional support to change the unsatisfactory situation. Objective: To establish a multicomponent intervention delivered on a web-based telemedicine platform and oriented with the Chinese hypertension management guidelines and to evaluate the effect of the intervention on blood pressure (BP) control for patients with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial of a hypertension management program was conducted at 66 community health centers in China from October 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020, with a 12-month follow-up. Patients with hypertension were blinded to randomization and were randomized to either the intervention group or control group. Hypertension was diagnosed at mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) readings higher than 140 and 90 mm Hg or with use of antihypertensive medication. Evaluation of the intervention effect was based on the principle of modified intention to treat. Interventions: Multicomponent intervention was delivered on a web-based platform and consisted of a primary prevention program for cardiovascular disease and standardized management for hypertension. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in BP control rate (SBP and DBP levels <140 and 90 mm Hg, or <130 and 80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) from baseline to the 12-month follow-up among patients with hypertension in the intervention and control groups. Results: A total of 4118 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [9.4] years; 2265 women [55.0%]) were included in the analysis, with 2985 in the intervention group and 1133 in the control group. The BP control rate at baseline was 22.8% in the intervention group and 22.5% in the control group. After 12 months of the intervention, the BP control rate for the intervention group compared with the control group was significantly higher (47.4% vs 30.2%; odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24; P < .001). The intervention effect on SBP level was -10.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.7 to -8.5 mm Hg; P < .001) and on DBP level was -1.8 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.8 to -0.8 mm Hg; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this trial showed that a multicomponent intervention delivered on a web-based platform improved BP control rate and lowered BP level more than usual care alone. Such a telemedicine program may provide a new, effective way to treat patients with hypertension in the community and may generate public health benefits across diverse populations. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800017791.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.