Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477477›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of Smoking, Comorbidity, Clinical Stage, and Treatment Intent With Socioeconomic Differences in Survival After Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Denmark.

Maja Halgren Olsen, Kirsten Frederiksen, Pernille Lassen, Charlotte Rotbøl, Trille Kristina Kjaer, Jørgen Johansen, Hanne Primdahl, Elo Andersen, Claus Andrup Kristensen, Maria Andersen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Maja Halgren OlsenDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirsten FrederiksenStatistics and Data Analysis, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille LassenDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Charlotte RotbølDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Trille Kristina KjaerSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørgen JohansenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanne PrimdahlDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Elo AndersenDepartment of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Claus Andrup KristensenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria AndersenDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mohammad FarhadiDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark.
Jens OvergaardDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Susanne Oksbjerg DaltonSurvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA)
Aarhus University Hospital · DKDanish Cancer Society · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The socioeconomic gap in survival after cancer is pronounced among patients with head and neck cancer. Understanding the mechanisms of this gap is crucial to target intervention strategies. Objective: To investigate socioeconomic differences in survival after oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) according to human papillomavirus (HPV) status and the extent to which smoking, comorbidity, clinical stage, and treatment intent explain the survival gap. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study was based on prospectively collected information on all patients with a diagnosis of OPSCC from the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group database and administrative registries. The study included 4600 patients born in 1921 or later, aged 30 years or older, and residing in Denmark 1 year prior to OPSCC diagnosis. Patients with missing information (547 [12%]) were excluded. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2019, and followed up until December 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from June 6 to October 4, 2022. Exposure: Socioeconomic position (educational level, disposable income, or cohabiting status). Main Outcomes and Measures: Socioeconomic differences in 5-year overall survival were estimated in Cox proportional hazards regression models by HPV status. The indirect effect and proportion mediated by smoking, comorbidity, clinical stage, and treatment intent were estimated based on a counterfactual approach. Results: The analyzed cohort comprised 4053 patients (1045 women [26%] and 3008 men [74%]). The median age was 61 years (IQR, 55-68 years), and 2563 patients (63%) had HPV-positive OPSCC while 1490 patients (37%) had HPV-negative OPSCC. The 5-year standardized overall survival was 10% to 15% lower among patients with a lower educational level, with low disposable income, or who were living alone (patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, 68%-71%; patients with HPV-negative OPSCC, 31%-34%) than patients with a higher educational level, high disposable income, or a cohabiting partner (patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, 81%-86%; patients with HPV-negative OPSCC, 43%-46%). Among patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, a considerable part of this survival gap was estimated to be associated with differences in smoking (27%-48%), comorbidity (10%-19%), clinical stage (8%-19%), and treatment intent (16%-28%). Among those with HPV-negative OPSCC, comorbidity (12%-22%) and treatment intent (16%-42%) were the primary potential mediators. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that, regardless of HPV status, patients with low socioeconomic position had 10% to 15% lower 5-year overall survival than patients with high socioeconomic position. A substantial part of this survival gap was associated with differences in smoking, comorbidity, clinical stage, or treatment intent at diagnosis.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSmokingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Identifiers

PMID36477477
PMCPMC9856247
OpenAlexW4311817225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.