Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477474›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Differentiating between bacterial and viral infections by estimated CRP velocity.

Michal Largman-Chalamish, Asaf Wasserman, Adi Silberman, Tal Levinson, Omri Ritter, Shlomo Berliner, David Zeltser, Itzhak Shapira, Ori Rogowski, Shani Shenhar-Tsarfaty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michal Largman-ChalamishDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Asaf WassermanDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adi SilbermanDepartment of Rheumatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tal LevinsonInfectious Diseases Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0364-7128
Omri RitterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shlomo BerlinerDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
David ZeltserDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Itzhak ShapiraDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ori RogowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shani Shenhar-TsarfatyDepartment of Internal Medicine C", D" and E", Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-1799
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferentiating between acute viral and bacterial infection is challenging due to the similarity in symptom presentation. Blood tests can assist in the diagnosis, but they reflect the immediate status and fail to consider the dynamics of an inflammatory response with time since symptom onset. We applied estimated C-reactive protein (CRP) velocity (eCRPv), as derived from the admission CRP level divided by time from symptom onset, in order to better distinguish between viral and bacterial infections.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the emergency department with a confirmed viral (n = 83) or bacterial (n = 181) infection. eCRPv was defined as the ratio between the absolute CRP level upon admission to time from symptom onset (in hours). Absolute CRP and eCRPv values were compared between the 3 groups.

resultsBacterial patients presented with higher CRP levels (133 mg/L) upon admission compared to viral patients (23.31 mg/L) (P < 0.001). Their median value of eCRPv velocity was 4 times higher compared to the viral patients (1.1 mg/L/h compared 0.25 mg/L/h, P < 0.001). Moreover, in intermediate values of CRP (100-150 mg/L) upon admission, in which the differential diagnosis is controversial, high eCRPv is indicative of bacterial infection, eCRPv >4 mg/L/h represents only bacterial patients.

conclusionsDuring an acute febrile illness, the eCRPv value can be used for rapid differentiation between bacterial and viral infection, especially in patients with high CRP values. This capability can potentially expedite the provision of appropriate therapeutic management. Further research and validation may open new applications of the kinetics of inflammation for rapid diagnosis of an infectious vs. a viral source of fever.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsVirus DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPhysicsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID36477474
PMCPMC9728869
OpenAlexW4311577979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.