ArticleScientific reports2022
High-throughput primer design by scoring in piecewise logistic model for multiple polymerase chain reaction variants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) variants requiring specific primer types are widely used in various PCR experiments, including generic PCR, inverse PCR, anchored PCR, and ARMS PCR. Few tools can be adapted for multiple PCR variants, and many tools select primers by filtration based on the given parameters, which result in frequent design failures. Here we introduce PrimerScore2, a robust high-throughput primer design tool that can design primers in one click for multiple PCR variants. It scores primers using a piecewise logistic model and the highest-scored primers are selected avoiding the issue of design failure and the necessity to loosen parameters to redesign, and it creatively evaluates specificity by predicting the efficiencies of all target/non-target products. To assess the prediction accuracy of the scores and efficiencies, two next generation sequencing (NGS) libraries were constructed-a 12-plex and a 57-plex-and the results showed that 17 out of 19 (89.5%) low-scoring pairs had a poor depth, 18 out of 19 (94.7%) high-scoring pairs had a high depth, and the depth ratios of the products were linearly correlated with the predicted efficiencies with a slope of 1.025 and a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.