Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477309›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Modeling genotype × environment interaction for single and multitrait genomic prediction in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).

Jaime Cuevas, Fredrik Reslow, Jose Crossa, Rodomiro Ortiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaime CuevasDepartamento de Energía, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo, Chetumal, Quintana Roo 77019, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-2867
Fredrik ReslowDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, Lomma SE 23436, Sweden.
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco 56237, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855
Rodomiro OrtizDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, Lomma SE 23436, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-7206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we extend research on genomic prediction (GP) to polysomic polyploid plant species with the main objective to investigate single-trait (ST) and multitrait (MT) multienvironment (ME) models using field trial data from 3 locations in Sweden [Helgegården (HEL), Mosslunda (MOS), Umeå (UM)] over 2 years (2020, 2021) of 253 potato cultivars and breeding clones for 5 tuber weight traits and 2 tuber flesh quality characteristics. This research investigated the GP of 4 genome-based prediction models with genotype × environment interactions (GEs): (1) ST reaction norm model (M1), (2) ST model considering covariances between environments (M2), (3) ST M2 extended to include a random vector that utilizes the environmental covariances (M3), and (4) MT model with GE (M4). Several prediction problems were analyzed for each of the GP accuracy of the 4 models. Results of the prediction of traits in HEL, the high yield potential testing site in 2021, show that the best-predicted traits were tuber flesh starch (%), weight of tuber above 60 or below 40 mm in size, and the total tuber weight. In terms of GP, accuracy model M4 gave the best prediction accuracy in 3 traits, namely tuber weight of 40-50 or above 60 mm in size, and total tuber weight, and very similar in the starch trait. For MOS in 2021, the best predictive traits were starch, weight of tubers above 60, 50-60, or below 40 mm in size, and the total tuber weight. MT model M4 was the best GP model based on its accuracy when some cultivars are observed in some traits. For the GP accuracy of traits in UM in 2021, the best predictive traits were the weight of tubers above 60, 50-60, or below 40 mm in size, and the best model was MT M4, followed by models ST M3 and M2.

Indexed as

Solanum tuberosumGene-Environment InteractionGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPlant TubersStarchStarchgenomic × environment interactiongenomic prediction in potatomultienvironment modelingmultiple trait modelingsingle-environment modelingsingle-trait modelingSolanum tuberosum

Identifiers

PMID36477309
PMCPMC9911059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.