Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477160›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study.

Rachael Lacy, Jini Puma, Michael Tubolino, David LaRocca, Lori A Crane, Lisa Miller, Chad D Morris, Sean T O'Leary, Jenn A Leiferman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael LacyRocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-9877
Jini PumaRocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Michael TubolinoDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
David LaRoccaRocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Lori A CraneDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Lisa MillerDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Chad D MorrisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Sean T O'LearyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Jenn A LeifermanRocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Colorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents' attitudes and beliefs of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and the barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in a rural community through a brief, online demographic survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews. Forty-one in depth interviews were conducted with parents (31-English and 10-Spanish-speaking) residing in rural and frontier counties in Colorado between September 2021 and February 2022. Six emergent themes related to COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake were identified among the population. These themes spanned the three levels of influence in the Social Ecological Model (individual, interpersonal, and community levels). The six themes were identified as such; 1) Vaccine accessibility was associated with pediatric COVID vaccine uptake in rural communities, 2) Previous pediatric vaccine behaviors were not associated with COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake, 3) Perceived health status of a child or family member influenced pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake, 4) COVID-19 health seeking behaviors, like COVID pediatric vaccine uptake, are influenced by an individual's prosocial or individualistic perspectives, 5) Child autonomy and "age of consent" frames vaccine decision making behaviors in parents, and lastly 6) Social networks impacted COVID-19 pediatric vaccine decision making. These findings inform next steps for COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake including targeted and tailored messaging for communities (cues to actions), engaging youth stakeholders, and identifying trusted sources to build rapport and trust between health professionals and community members. The growing vaccine hesitancy among parents has serious implications for disease eradication and future viral outbreaks. Understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to pediatric vaccine uptake is important to maintain the health of our youth and communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentChildFamilyHumansParentsRural PopulationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36477160
PMCPMC9728923
OpenAlexW4311575799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.