ArticleScientific reports2022
Deep learning classification of urinary sediment crystals with optimal parameter tuning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding chemical composition of urinary crystals from ultrasonic echo signals via deep learning.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- A multi-head YOLOv12 with self-supervised pretraining for urinary sediment particle detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Are we ready to integrate advanced artificial intelligence models in clinical laboratory?Biochemia medica · 2025Review
- A New Texture Spectrum Based on Parallel Encoded Texture Unit and Its Application on Image Classification: A Potential Prospect for Vision Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic Classification of Particles in the Urine Sediment Test with the Developed Artificial Intelligence-Based Hybrid Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The examination of urinary sediment crystals, the sedimentary components of urine, is useful in screening tests, and is always performed in medical examinations. The examination of urinary sediment crystals is typically done by classifying them under a microscope. Although automated analyzers are commercially available, manual classification is required, which is time-consuming and varies depending on the technologist performing the test and the laboratory. A set of test images was created, consisting of training, validation, and test images. The training images were transformed and augmented using various methods. The test images were classified to determine the patterns that could be correctly classified. Convolutional neural networks were used for training. Furthermore, we also considered the case where the crystal subcategories were not treated as separate. Learning with all parameters except the random cropping parameter showed the highest accuracy value. Treating the subcategories together or separately did not seem to affect the accuracy value. The accuracy of the best pattern was 0.918. When matched to a real-world case, the percentage of correct answers was 88%. Although the number of images was limited, good results were obtained in the classification of crystal images with optimal parameter tuning. The parameter optimization performed in this study can be used as a reference for future studies, with the goal of image classification by deep learning in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.