Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477073›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Predicting Chemotherapy Resistance in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Ratio of Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Platelets.

Gatot Nyarumenteng Adhipurnawan Winarno, Ayu Insafi Mulyantari, Andi Kurniadi, Dodi Suardi, Zulvayanti Zulvayanti, Nurvita Trianasari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gatot Nyarumenteng Adhipurnawan WinarnoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ayu Insafi MulyantariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Andi KurniadiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Dodi SuardiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Zulvayanti ZulvayantiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Nurvita TrianasariEconomics and Business School, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia.
Padjadjaran University · IDDr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital · IDTelkom University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have recently been used as inflammatory biomarkers for cancer patients. This study aims to determine the role of pretreatment NLR, LMR, and PLR in predicting chemoresistance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 129 low-risk and high-risk GTN patients who had received first-line chemotherapy were enrolled in this historical cohort study. The pretreatment NLR, LMR, and PLR values were analyzed to predict the resistance to first-line chemotherapy in low-risk and high-risk GTN patients. RESULTS Chemoresistant patients had significantly higher NLR than chemosensitive patients in low-risk and high-risk GTN patients (P<0.05). In high-risk GTN, patients with lower LMR and higher PLR tended to have chemoresistance to first-line chemotherapy (P=0.008, P=0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that the NLR, LMR, and PLR cut-off points of 2.654, 3.8, and 192.174, respectively, were associated with chemoresistance in high-risk GTN (P=0.0001, P=0.011, P=0.0001). The combination of NLR, PLR, and FIGO score in high-risk GTN was the best combination among other combinations with cut-off value >17 (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Higher NLR, lower LMR, and higher PLR were associated with chemoresistance for high-risk GTN patients. Furthermore, NLR, LMR, and PLR can improve the accuracy of predicting resistance to first-line chemotherapy in high-risk GTN.

Indexed as

Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseNeutrophilsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphocytesMonocytesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36477073
PMCPMC9745950
OpenAlexW4309883510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.