Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2022
Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Deep Learning Super Resolution Reconstruction for Fast and Motion Robust T2-weighted Prostate MRI
Super-fast 3T Prostate MRI Using High Gradient Strength and Deep Learning: Initial Experience
Integrated Noninvasive Strategy Guided by Multiparametric MRI and the Prostate Health Index for Risk-Adapted Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (INSIGHT-PCa Study)
A Single-arm, Multicenter, Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial of Delayed Fixed-duration Combination With Sotoraclax Following Zanubrutinib Induction in Patients With CLL/SLL: Stop Trial 2.0
Who cites it
180 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 331 citations in OpenAlex.
- Refining biopsy strategies stratified by PI-RADS score in men: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial-intelligence models vs. radiologists in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on mpMRI: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prognostic value of baseline circulating tumor DNA levels in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- The scientific evidence of commercial AI products for MRI acceleration: a systematic review.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- 2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review.European urology · 2023Pooled it
- Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy.The Journal of urology · 2023Guideline
- Evaluating the Impact of Age on Prostate Cancer Overdiagnosis Using Long-Term Follow-Up From the CAP Randomised Trial.International journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- Comparing the effectiveness of prostate cancer screening protocols: European Association of Urology- and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-based strategies.International journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with and without PSMA-PET-Targeted Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- The value of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer screening: A retrospective real-world feasibility study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Contrast-free MRI-first screening in young asymptomatic men: Prostate characteristics and cancer detection rates.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of the combined systematic 12-core with concomitant MRI image-guided targeted prostate biopsy: can the MRI targeted biopsy stand on its own?International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Response to correspondence regarding "The value of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer screening: a retrospective real-world feasibility study".Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- A Triple Clinical Filter Model for Selective Omission of Systematic Cores in Transperineal Cognitive Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Observational Study.The Prostate · 2026Observational
- Prostate MRI reporting and its impact on clinical decision-making: the urologists' perspective.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Successes and challenges in developing a magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound machine fusion prostate biopsy service.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Review
- Implementation and First Results of the Czech Nationwide Prostate Cancer Screening Pilot Program.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Apparent diffusion coefficient-based single-sequence radiomics integrated with clinical variables and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScreening for prostate cancer is burdened by a high rate of overdiagnosis. The most appropriate algorithm for population-based screening is unknown.
methodsWe invited 37,887 men who were 50 to 60 years of age to undergo regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Participants with a PSA level of 3 ng per milliliter or higher underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate; one third of the participants were randomly assigned to a reference group that underwent systematic biopsy as well as targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions shown on MRI. The remaining participants were assigned to the experimental group and underwent MRI-targeted biopsy only. The primary outcome was clinically insignificant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of 3+3. The secondary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of at least 3+4. Safety was also assessed.
resultsOf the men who were invited to undergo screening, 17,980 (47%) participated in the trial. A total of 66 of the 11,986 participants in the experimental group (0.6%) received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, as compared with 72 of 5994 participants (1.2%) in the reference group, a difference of -0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.0 to -0.4; relative risk, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64; P<0.001). The relative risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in the experimental group as compared with the reference group was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.1). Clinically significant cancer that was detected only by systematic biopsy was diagnosed in 10 participants in the reference group; all cases were of intermediate risk and involved mainly low-volume disease that was managed with active surveillance. Serious adverse events were rare (<0.1%) in the two groups.
conclusionsThe avoidance of systematic biopsy in favor of MRI-directed targeted biopsy for screening and early detection in persons with elevated PSA levels reduced the risk of overdiagnosis by half at the cost of delaying detection of intermediate-risk tumors in a small proportion of patients. (Funded by Karin and Christer Johansson's Foundation and others; GÖTEBORG-2 ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN94604465.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.