Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Testing the effectiveness of alcohol health warning label formats: An online experimental study with Australian adult drinkers.

Emily Brennan, Kimberley Dunstone, Amanda Vittiglia, Sam Mancuso, Sarah Durkin, Michael D Slater, Janet Hoek, Simone Pettigrew, Melanie Wakefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily BrennanCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-0210
Kimberley DunstoneCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda VittigliaCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1603-3478
Sam MancusoCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah DurkinCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael D SlaterSchool of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Janet HoekDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-1539
Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melanie WakefieldCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health warning labels (HWLs) on alcohol containers may help reduce population-level alcohol consumption. However, few studies have examined the most effective formats for alcohol HWLs. This study tested the effects of three different types of alcohol HWLs. In an online experiment, N = 1,755 Australian adult drinkers were randomly assigned to one of five conditions: (a) No HWL control; (b) DrinkWise control (industry-developed labels currently on some containers); (c) Text-Only HWLs; (d) Text + Pictogram HWLs; or (e) Text + Photograph HWLs. In the three intervention conditions, participants were exposed to eight HWLs, each depicting a different long-term harm. Exposure occurred during an initial session, and repeatedly over the subsequent eight days. Differences between conditions were assessed immediately following initial exposure and at nine-day follow-up. Compared to participants in the No HWL control, participants exposed to Text + Pictogram HWLs were more likely to have intentions to avoid drinking alcohol completely in the next month (post-exposure) and intentions to drink less alcohol in the next week (follow-up), and participants in all three intervention conditions reported stronger negative emotional arousal (follow-up) and weaker positive emotional arousal (follow-up). Compared to participants in the DrinkWise control, those exposed to Text + Pictogram HWLs had stronger intentions to drink less alcohol in the next week and intentions to avoid drinking alcohol completely in the next month (follow-up), participants in the Text + Photograph condition reported significantly weaker positive emotional arousal, and all three intervention conditions resulted in stronger negative emotional arousal. There would likely be benefits to public health if any of the three types of intervention HWLs were implemented. However, there is some evidence that Text + Pictogram HWLs should be recommended over Text-Only or Text + Photograph HWLs, given they were the only HWLs to increase intentions to drink less.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesFood LabelingAdultAustraliaHumans

Identifiers

PMID36476743
PMCPMC9729007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.