Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476724›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Prediction of oxygen requirement in patients with COVID-19 using a pre-trained chest radiograph xAI model: efficient development of auditable risk prediction models via a fine-tuning approach.

Joowon Chung, Doyun Kim, Jongmun Choi, Sehyo Yune, Kyoung Doo Song, Seonkyoung Kim, Michelle Chua, Marc D Succi, John Conklin, Maria G Figueiro Longo and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Explainable & Safe Artificial Intelligence in Radiology].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joowon Chung *Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Doyun Kim *Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jongmun ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sehyo YuneDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kyoung Doo SongDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Seonkyoung KimDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle ChuaDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Marc D SucciDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John ConklinDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Maria G Figueiro LongoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeanne B AckmanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Milena PetranovicDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael H LevDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Synho DoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. sdo@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk prediction requires comprehensive integration of clinical information and concurrent radiological findings. We present an upgraded chest radiograph (CXR) explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) model, which was trained on 241,723 well-annotated CXRs obtained prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for detection of 20 radiographic features was 0.955 (95% CI 0.938-0.955) on PA view and 0.909 (95% CI 0.890-0.925) on AP view. Coexistent and correlated radiographic findings are displayed in an interpretation table, and calibrated classifier confidence is displayed on an AI scoreboard. Retrieval of similar feature patches and comparable CXRs from a Model-Derived Atlas provides justification for model predictions. To demonstrate the feasibility of a fine-tuning approach for efficient and scalable development of xAI risk prediction models, we applied our CXR xAI model, in combination with clinical information, to predict oxygen requirement in COVID-19 patients. Prediction accuracy for high flow oxygen (HFO) and mechanical ventilation (MV) was 0.953 and 0.934 at 24 h and 0.932 and 0.836 at 72 h from the time of emergency department (ED) admission, respectively. Our CXR xAI model is auditable and captures key pathophysiological manifestations of cardiorespiratory diseases and cardiothoracic comorbidities. This model can be efficiently and broadly applied via a fine-tuning approach to provide fully automated risk and outcome predictions in various clinical scenarios in real-world practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19OxygenArtificial IntelligenceHumansPandemicsPatientsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID36476724
PMCPMC9729627
OpenAlexW4311585688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.