Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476716›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Assessment of mastitis in camel using high-throughput sequencing.

Rita Rahmeh, Abrar Akbar, Husam Alomirah, Mohamed Kishk, Abdulaziz Al-Ateeqi, Anisha Shajan, Thnayan Alonaizi, Alfonso Esposito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinicopathological study on camel mastitis at Matrouh Governorate.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita RahmehEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-3650
Abrar AkbarEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Husam AlomirahEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Mohamed KishkEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-2770
Abdulaziz Al-AteeqiEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Anisha ShajanEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Thnayan AlonaiziEnvironment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Alfonso EspositoInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy.
Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research · KWInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camel milk is recognized as a functional food with significant economic value. Mastitis is one of the most common and costly diseases in the dairy industry. Mastitis, which is caused by pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and algae, has an impact on the quality and quantity of milk produced as well as animal health and welfare. There is a paucity of data on the etiological factors that cause camel mastitis. This study reports the bacterial and fungal community involved in clinical camel mastitis using Illumina amplicon sequencing. A total of 25 milk samples were analyzed, including 9 samples with mastitis and 16 healthy samples. The bacterial community in healthy samples was significantly more diverse and abundant than in mastitis samples. The fungal population in mastitis samples, on the other hand, was more diverse and abundant. As compared to healthy samples, the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Schlegelella, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, Lactococcus, Jeotgalicoccus. and Klebsiella were found to be abundant in mastitic milk. However, the genera Corynebacterium, Enteractinococcus, unclassified Sphingomonadaceae, Atopostipes, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Lactobacillus, Sphingomonas, Pediococcus and Moraxella were reduced. In the fungal community, mastitis caused a significant increase in the relative abundance of the majority of taxa, including Candida, Phanerochaete, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and unclassified Pyronemataceae, while Penicillium and Alternaria showed a decline in relative abundance. In the bacterial and fungal communities, the discriminant analysis showed 19 and 5 differently abundant genera in healthy milk and mastitic milk, respectively. In conclusion, this study showed a microbiome dysbiosis linked to clinical camel mastitis, with opportunistic pathogens outgrowing commensal bacteria that were reduced. These findings are essential in designing an appropriate control program in the camel dairy herd, as well as in preventing and treating camel mastitis.

Indexed as

CamelusHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimals

Identifiers

PMID36476716
PMCPMC9728900
OpenAlexW4311581075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.