Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476658›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Drug response profiles in patient-derived cancer cells across histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: real-time therapy tailoring for a patient with low-grade serous carcinoma.

Astrid Murumägi, Daniela Ungureanu, Suleiman Khan, Mariliina Arjama, Katja Välimäki, Aleksandr Ianevski, Philipp Ianevski, Rebecka Bergström, Alice Dini, Anna Kanerva and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Pan-Cancer Ex Vivo Drug Screen Atlas for Functional Precision Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Astrid MurumägiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. astrid.murumagi@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-188X
Daniela UngureanuApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Suleiman KhanInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mariliina ArjamaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Katja VälimäkiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Aleksandr IanevskiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Philipp IanevskiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Rebecka BergströmDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Alice DiniApplied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-4551
Anna KanervaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Riitta Koivisto-KoranderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna TapperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Heini LassusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-5147
Mikko LoukovaaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Andrus MägiTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Akira HirasawaDepartment of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Vilja PietiäinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-2406
Teijo PellinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-7373
Ralf BützowDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-5099
Tero AittokallioInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-9769
Olli KallioniemiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Olli.Kallioniemi@scilifelab.se.
University of Helsinki · FIKarolinska Institutet · SEKeio University · JPOkayama University · JPOslo University Hospital · NOTartu University Hospital · EE

Funding

Academy of Finland 313267Academy of Finland 326238Academy of Finland 333583Academy of Finland 344698Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 278741Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 333583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many efforts are underway to develop novel therapies against the aggressive high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs), while our understanding of treatment options for low-grade (LGSOC) or mucinous (MUCOC) of ovarian malignancies is not developing as well. We describe here a functional precision oncology (fPO) strategy in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), which involves high-throughput drug testing of patient-derived ovarian cancer cells (PDCs) with a library of 526 oncology drugs, combined with genomic and transcriptomic profiling. HGSOC, LGSOC and MUCOC PDCs had statistically different overall drug response profiles, with LGSOCs responding better to targeted inhibitors than HGSOCs. We identified several subtype-specific drug responses, such as LGSOC PDCs showing high sensitivity to MDM2, ERBB2/EGFR inhibitors, MUCOC PDCs to MEK inhibitors, whereas HGSOCs showed strongest effects with CHK1 inhibitors and SMAC mimetics. We also explored several drug combinations and found that the dual inhibition of MEK and SHP2 was synergistic in MAPK-driven EOCs. We describe a clinical case study, where real-time fPO analysis of samples from a patient with metastatic, chemorefractory LGSOC with a CLU-NRG1 fusion guided clinical therapy selection. fPO-tailored therapy with afatinib, followed by trastuzumab and pertuzumab, successfully reduced tumour burden and blocked disease progression over a five-year period. In summary, fPO is a powerful approach for the identification of systematic drug response differences across EOC subtypes, as well as to highlight patient-specific drug regimens that could help to optimise therapies to individual patients in the future.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesPrecision MedicineMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36476658
PMCPMC9938120
OpenAlexW4310947211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.