Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476592›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Implementation of a palliative care intervention for patients with COPD - a mixed methods process evaluation of the COMPASSION study.

Johanna M C Broese, Rianne M J J van der Kleij, Els M L Verschuur, Huib A M Kerstjens, Yvonne Engels, Niels H Chavannes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna M C BroesePublic Health & Primary care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. j.m.c.broese@lumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-2305
Rianne M J J van der KleijPublic Health & Primary care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-4978
Els M L VerschuurLung Alliance Netherlands, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-7229
Huib A M KerstjensRespiratory Medicine & Tuberculosis, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-7927
Yvonne EngelsAnaesthesiology, Pain & Palliative medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-1018
Niels H ChavannesPublic Health & Primary care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-9199
Leiden University · NLLung Foundation Netherlands · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLittle direction exists on how to effectively implement palliative care for patients with COPD. In the COMPASSION study, we developed, executed, and evaluated a multifaceted implementation strategy to improve the uptake of region-tailored palliative care intervention components into routine COPD care. We evaluated the implementation strategy and assessed the implementation process, barriers, and facilitators.

methodsA mixed methods process evaluation was performed. Primary and secondary healthcare providers in four hospital regions in the Netherlands were trained. Patients identified during hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation received palliative care and were followed for a year. Various sources were used: process data, questionnaires including the End-of-life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS), medical records, monitoring meetings, and interviews. The Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to categorize implementation determinants.

resultsThe training sessions with roleplay were positively evaluated and increased professionals' self-efficacy in providing palliative care statistically significantly. Of 98 patients identified, 44 (44.9%) received one or more palliative care conversations at the outpatient clinic. Having those conversations was highly valued by healthcare providers because it led to clarity and peace of mind for the patient and higher job satisfaction. Coordination and continuity remained suboptimal. Most important barriers to implementation were time constraints, the COVID-19 pandemic, and barriers related to transmural and interdisciplinary collaboration. Facilitators were the systematic screening of patients for palliative care needs, adapting to the patient's readiness, conducting palliative care conversations with a pulmonologist and a COPD nurse together, and meeting regularly with a small team led by a dedicated implementation leader.

conclusionsProviding integrated palliative care for patients with COPD is highly valued by healthcare providers but remains challenging. Our findings will guide future implementation efforts. Future research should focus on how to optimize transmural and interdisciplinary collaboration. Trial registration The COMPASSION study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NL7644. Registration date: 07/04/2019.

Indexed as

COVID-19Palliative CareHumansNetherlandsPandemicsChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEvaluation studiesImplementationPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID36476592
PMCPMC9727973
OpenAlexW4311588640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.